Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation

Part IV The Presentation of the Case: Evidence and Hearings, Ch.16 Evidence

David D. Caron, Lee M. Caplan, Matti Pellonpää

From: The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules: A Commentary (1st Edition)

David D. Caron, Matti Pellonpää, Lee M. Caplan

A newer edition of The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules is available. Latest edition (2 ed.)
Next Edition: 2nd Edition Latest edition (2 ed.)

From: Oxford Legal Research Library (http://olrl.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 27 October 2020

Questions of evidence are among the most problematic aspects of any regulation of international arbitration. This is especially so in the case of arbitration under the UNCITRAL Rules, which are intended for application in proceedings involving parties from around the world and from various legal systems, including common and civil law. The UNCITRAL Rules have adopted the evidentiary principles of neither system as such, but rather have aimed at creating a relatively flexible framework within which the arbitrators are “freed from having to observe the strict legal rules of evidence” of any particular domestic regime. This Chapter addresses Article 24 of the UNCITRAL Rules; Article 25, a closely related provision, is addressed in Chapter 17. (chapter 17)

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.