User Account
- Personal Profile: Sign in
- or Create
- See all online law products
- Save
- Cite
-
Email this content
Share Link
Copy this link, or click below to email it to a friendEmail this contentor copy the link directly:The link was not copied. Your current browser may not support copying via this button.Link copied successfully
- Share This
Subscriber sign in
- Preliminary Material
- Dedication
- Preface
- Table of Contents
- Table of Cases and Other Practice
- Table of Instruments
- List of Abbreviations
- Main Text
- Ch.1 Introduction
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The International Arbitral Process and the Work of UNCITRAL
- 3 The Development of the UNCITRAL Rules of Procedure
- A The Drafting of the 1976 Rules
- B The UNCITRAL Rules and the Iran–US Claims Tribunal
- C The UNCITRAL Rules and the 1985 UNCITRAL Model Law
- D Adoption of the UNCITRAL Rules in other Public and Private Institutions
- E Investor–State Arbitration and the UNCITRAL Rules
- F The 2010 UNCITRAL Rules
- G The Work of UNCITRAL on Rules for Transparency in Investor–State Arbitration
- 4 How to Use this Commentary
- 5 Conclusion
- Part I Fundamental Principles and the Legal Framework within which the Arbitral Tribunal Operates
- Preliminary Material
- Ch.2 Scope of Application, General Provisions, and Place of Arbitration
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Scope of Application—Article 1
- A Text of the 2010 UNCITRAL Rule
- B Commentary
- (1) General comments
- (2) Scope of application—Article 1(1)
- (3) No writing requirement for agreement to arbitration—Article 1(1)
- (4) Party autonomy and modification of the Rules—Article 1(1)
- (5) Presumptive scope of application—Article 1(2) and (3)
- (6) Future transparency rules for investor–state arbitration
- (7) Model arbitration clause
- (8) Comparison to the 1976 UNCITRAL Rules
- C Extracts from the Practice of Investment and other Tribunals
- 3 General Provisions—Article 17
- A Text of the 2010 UNCITRAL Rule
- B Commentary
- C Extracts from the Practice of Investment and other Tribunals
- D Extracts from the Practice of the Iran–US Claims Tribunal
- 4 Place of Arbitration—Article 18
- A Text of the 2010 UNCITRAL Rule
- B Commentary
- (1) Meaning of “place of arbitration”
- (2) Selection of the place of arbitration—Article 18(1)
- (3) Where the award is “deemed to have been made”—Article 18(1)
- (4) The location of tribunal deliberations and meetings “for any other purpose, including hearings”—Article 18(2)
- (5) Comparison to the 1976 UNCITRAL Rules
- C Extracts from the Practice of Investment Tribunals
- D Extracts from the Practice of the Iran–US Claims Tribunal
- Ch.3 Applicable Law, Amiable Compositeur
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Applicable Law—Article 35
- A Text of the 2010 UNCITRAL Rule
- B Commentary
- C Extracts from the Practice of Investment Tribunals
- D Extracts from the practice of the Iran–US Claims Tribunal
- Part II Arbitral Procedures to Control the Selection and Conduct of Arbitrators
- Preliminary Material
- Ch.4 The Number and Selection of Arbitrators
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Designating and Appointing Authorities—Article 6
- 3 The Number of Arbitrators—Article 7
- 4 Appointment of the Sole Arbitrator—Article 8
- 5 Appointment of a Three-Person Panel—Article 9
- 6 Appointment in Multi-Party Arbitration—Article 10
- 7 Comparison to the 1976 UNCITRAL Rules
- Ch.5 The Challenge of Arbitrators
- 1 Introduction
- A An Overview of Challenges before Investment and other Tribunals
- 1 Challenge decision of April 15, 1993
- 2 Challenge decision of January 11, 1995
- 3 Challenge decision by a Division of the LCIA—October–December 2005
- 4 The US Government's challenge of Professor James Anaya in the Grand River arbitration—2007
- 5 The Argentine Government's challenge of Mr Judd L Kessler in the National Grid arbitration—2007
- 6 The Argentine Government's challenges of Professor Gabrielle Kaufmann-Kohler in the AWG Group arbitration—2007–2008
- 7 The Argentine Government's challenge of Mr Stanimir Alexandrov in the ICS arbitration—2009
- 8 The claimant's challenge to Mr J Christopher Thomas in the Gallo arbitration—2009
- B An Overview of the Challenges before the Iran–US Claims Tribunal
- 1 The Iranian Government challenge of Nils Mangård—1982
- 2 The US Government challenge of Judges Kashani and Shafeiei—1984
- 3 The first Iranian Government challenge of Judge Briner in Case No 55, Amoco Iran and Islamic Republic of Iran—1988
- 4 The second Iranian Government challenge of Judge Briner—1989
- 5 The third Iranian Government challenge of Judge Briner—1989
- 6 The US claimant's challenge of Judge Noori in Case No 248, Carlson and Melli Industrial Group—1990
- 7 The Iranian Government challenge of Judge Arangio-Ruiz—1991
- 8 The Iranian Government challenges of Judge Krzysztof Skubiszewski—1999
- 9 The US Government challenge of Judge Bengt Broms—2001
- 10 The US claimant's challenge of Judge Bengt Broms in connection with Case No 485, Frederica Lincoln Riahi—2004
- 11 The US Government challenge of Judges Assadollah Noori, Koorosh Ameli, and Mohsen Aghahosseini—2005–2006
- 12 The Iranian Government Challenge of Judge Krzysztof Skubiszewski and the US Government Challenge of Judge Hamid Reza Oloumi Yazdi—2007
- 13 The Iranian Government challenge of Judge Krzysztof Skubiszewski and Judge Gaetano Arangio-Ruiz—2009
- 14 The US Government challenge of Judge Seyed Jamal Seifi—2010
- 15 The Iranian Government Challenge of Judge Charles Brower—2010
- C The Exclusivity of the UNCITRAL Challenge Procedure
- A An Overview of Challenges before Investment and other Tribunals
- 2 The Duty to Disclose—Article 11
- 3 The Grounds for Challenge—Article 12
- A Text of the 2010 UNCITRAL Rule
- B Commentary
- 1 Challenge on the ground of justifiable doubts as to impartiality or independence—general remarks on Article 12(1)
- 2 Challenge on the ground of justifiable doubts as to impartiality or independence
- a The meaning of “impartiality” and “independence”
- b When are doubts as to impartiality or independence justified?
- 1 An arbitrator's relationship with a witness
- 2 An arbitrator's financial relationship with a party (shareholding)
- 3 An arbitrator's financial relationship with a party (salary)
- 4 An arbitrator's previous employment by the parent corporation of a party
- 5 An arbitrator's representation in another forum that is adverse to a party
- 6 An arbitrator's previous advocacy on behalf of a country formerly adverse to a sovereign party
- 7 An arbitrator's representation of a third party with a right to intervene in the proceedings
- 8 An arbitrator's handling of the proceedings
- 9 An arbitrator's statement regarding a party or the dispute
- 10 An arbitrator's decision-making
- 11 An arbitrator's breach of the confidentiality of deliberations
- 12 An arbitrator's physical assault of a fellow arbitrator
- c The standard of independence and impartiality does not vary according to the stage of the proceedings
- d A failure to disclose under article 11 may give rise to, but does not per se establish, justifiable doubts as to impartiality or independence
- e Are there any limitations on the circumstances which may be used as the basis for justifiable doubts?
- 3 Article 12(1) as providing the exclusive grounds for challenge
- 4 When may a party challenge the arbitrator it has appointed—Article 12(2)
- C Extracts from the Practice of Investment and other Tribunals
- D Extracts from the Practice of the Iran–US Claims Tribunal
- 4 The Initiation of the Challenge and the Potential for Agreement to the Challenge—Article 13
- A Text of the 2010 UNCITRAL Rule
- B Commentary
- 1 When notice of challenge must be made—Article 13(1)
- 2 To whom should notice be sent; what form should notice take; sufficiency of the notice; who may send notice—Article 13(2)
- 3 Procedure if challenge is accepted by all other parties or challenged arbitrator withdraws—Article 13(3)
- 4 Timeline for seeking a decision on a challenge—Article 13(4)
- C Extracts from the Practice of Investment Tribunals
- D Extracts from the Practice of the Iran–US Claims Tribunal
- 5 The Resolution of the Challenge
- A Text of the 2010 UNCITRAL Rule
- B Commentary
- 1 Which authority shall make the decision on the challenge if the other party does not agree to the challenge or the challenged arbitrator does not withdraw?
- 2 When may a party seek the assistance of the PCA Secretary-General in designating an appointing authority?
- 3 What procedures the appointing authority may follow in deciding the challenge
- 4 Limitations on the powers of the appointing authority
- C Extracts from the Practice of Investment Tribunals
- D Extracts from the Practice of the Iran–US Claims Tribunal
- 6 Comparison to the 1976 UNCITRAL Rules
- 1 Introduction
- Ch.6 Failure to Act, other Disruptions, and the Replacement of an Arbitrator
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Failure to Act and other Disruptions—Article 12(3)
- A Text of the 2010 UNCITRAL Rule
- B Commentary
- 1 Drafting history of the rule and general comments
- 2 Iran–US Claims Tribunal practice with respect to an arbitrator's failure to act
- 3 Iran—US Claims Tribunal practice with respect to other disruptions
- a A note on substitute arbitrators
- b A note on truncated proceedings
- 1 The absence of Mr Sani, Fall 1983
- 2 The absence of Judge Mostafavi, Spring 1988
- 3 The practice of the Tribunal regarding absence from the hearing
- 4 The practice of the Tribunal regarding the rendering of awards despite a refusal to sign
- 5 The practice of the Tribunal regarding the rendering of awards on agreed terms despite no participation by an arbitrator
- 6 The practice of the Tribunal regarding the holding of pre-hearing conference despite the absence of an arbitrator
- c A note on resignation of an arbitrator
- 4 Comparison to the 1976 UNCITRAL Rules
- C Extracts from the Practice of Investment Tribunals
- D Extracts from the Practice of the Iran–US Claims Tribunal
- 3 Replacement of an Arbitrator—Article 14
- 4 Repetition of Hearings in the Event of Replacement of an Arbitrator—Article 15
- Ch.7 Exclusion of Liability for Arbitrators and other Participants
- Ch.8 The Institution of the Appointing Authority
- Part III The Initiation of the Arbitration and the Identification and Clarification of the Issues Presented
- Preliminary Material
- Ch.9 Representation and Assistance
- Ch.10 The Notice Initiating Arbitration and the Response
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Notice Initiating Arbitration—Article 3
- A Text of the 2010 UNCITRAL Rule
- B Commentary
- (1) The requirement to communicate a notice of arbitration—Article 3(1)
- (2) The date of commencement of arbitration proceedings—Article 3(2)
- (3) Mandatory information provided in the notice of arbitration—Article 3(3)
- (4) Additional information provided in the notice of arbitration—Article 3(4)
- (5) Insufficiency of the notice of arbitration—Article 3(5)
- (6) International investment agreements and the notice of arbitration
- (7) The notice of arbitration at the Iran–US Claims Tribunal
- (8) Comparison to the 1976 UNCITRAL Rules
- C Extracts from the Practice of Investment Tribunals
- 3 The Response to the Notice of Arbitration—Article 4
- A Text of the 2010 UNCITRAL Rule
- B Commentary
- (1) The requirement to respond to the notice of arbitration—Article 4(1)
- (2) Mandatory contents of the response to the notice of arbitration—Article 4(1)
- (3) Optional contents of the response to the notice of arbitration—Article 4(2)
- (4) Absence, lateness, or insufficiency of the response to the notice of arbitration—Article 4(3)
- (5) Comparison to the 1976 UNCITRAL Rules
- Ch.11 The Choice of Language
- Ch.12 Notice and the Calculation of Periods of Time
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Notice and Calculation of Periods of Time—Article 2
- A Text of the 2010 UNCITRAL Rule
- B Commentary
- C Extracts from the Practice of Investment Tribunals
- D Extracts from the Practice of the Iran–United States Claims Tribunal
- Ch.13 Statements of Claim and Defence
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Statement of Claim—Article 20
- 3 The Statement of Defence—Article 21
- A Text of the 2010 UNCITRAL Rule
- B Commentary
- C Extracts from the Practice of Investment Tribunals
- D Extracts from the Practice of the Iran–US Claims Tribunal
- Ch.14 Objections to the Jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Objections to Jurisdiction—Article 23
- A Text of the 2010 UNCITRAL Rule
- B Commentary
- (1) The power of the tribunal to determine its own jurisdiction—Article 23(1)
- (2) Objections to the existence or validity of the contract of which the arbitration agreement is a part and the doctrine of separability—Article 23(1)
- (3) When objections should be raised—Article 23(2)
- (4) When objections should be ruled upon—Article 23(3)
- (5) Comparison to the 1976 UNCITRAL Rules
- C Extracts from the Practice of Investment Tribunals
- D Extracts from the Practice of the Iran–US Claims Tribunal
- Ch.15 Amendments to the Claim or Defence
- Ch.16 Further Written Statements and Time Limits on Submission
- Ch.17 Interim Measures
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Interim Measures—Article 26
- A Text of the 2010 UNCITRAL Rule
- B Commentary
- (1) The precondition of a request by a party—Article 26(1)
- (2) The types of interim measures that may be granted—Article 26(2)
- (3) Conditions for the ordering of interim measures—Article 26(3)
- (4) Conditions relaxed for the preservation of evidence—Article 26(4)
- (5) The form (award or order) in which interim measures are granted
- (6) Tribunal's power to modify, suspend or terminate interim measures—Article 26(5)
- (7) Security for the costs of interim measures—Article 26(6)
- (8) Disclosure by any party of any material change—Article 26(7)
- (9) Liability for costs and damages—Article 26(8)
- (10) Relations between the arbitral tribunal and municipal courts in issuing interim measures—Article 26(9)
- (11) Issuance of preliminary orders
- (12) Comparison to the 1976 UNCITRAL Rules
- C Extracts from the Practice of Investment Tribunals
- D Extracts from the Practice of the Iran–US Claims Tribunal
- Part IV The Presentation of the Case: Evidence and Hearings
- Preliminary Material
- Ch.18 Evidence
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Evidence—Article 27
- A Text of the 2010 UNCITRAL Rule
- B Commentary
- C Extracts from the Practice of Investment Tribunals
- D Extracts from the Practice of the Iran–US Claims Tribunal
- 1 Tribunal Rules (1983), Article 24(1)—Burden of Proof
- 2 Tribunal Rules (1983), Article 24(2)—Summary of evidence
- 3 Tribunal Rules (1983), Article 24(3)—Document production
- 4 Tribunal Rules (1983), Article 25(5)—Written witness statements
- 5 Tribunal Rules (1983), Article 25(6)—Admissibility, relevance, materiality, and weight of the evidence
- Ch.19 The Hearings
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Hearings—Article 28
- A Text of the 2010 UNCITRAL Rule
- B Commentary
- (1) Notice of hearing—Article 28(1)
- (2) The conduct of the hearing—Article 28(2)–(4)
- (3) Comparison to the 1976 UNCITRAL Rules
- C Extracts from the Practice of Investment Tribunals
- D Extracts from the Practice of the Iran–US Claims Tribunal
- 3 Closure of the Hearing—Article 31
- Ch.20 Tribunal-Appointed Experts
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Tribunal-Appointed Experts—Article 29
- A Text of the 2010 UNCITRAL Rule
- B Commentary
- (1) General comments
- (2) Appointment by the tribunal and terms of reference—Article 29(1)–(2)
- (3) Objections to the qualifications or the impartiality and independence of the tribunal-appointed expert—Article 29(2)
- (4) The provision of relevant information to the tribunal-appointed expert—Article 29(3)
- (5) The tribunal-appointed expert's report—Article 29(4)
- (6) Expert hearings—Article 29(5)
- (7) A note on party-appointed “expert witnesses”
- (8) Comparison to the 1976 UNCITRAL Rules
- C Extracts from the Practice of Investment Tribunals
- D Extracts from the Practice of the Iran–US Claims Tribunal
- Part V Default and Waiver
- Part VI The Award
- Preliminary Material
- Ch.23 Deliberations and Decisions
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Decisions—Article 33
- A Text of the 2010 UNCITRAL Rule
- B Commentary
- C Extracts from the Practice of Investment and other Tribunals
- D Extracts from the Practice of the Iran–US Claims Tribunal
- Ch.24 Form and Effect
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Form and Effect—Article 34
- A Text of the 2010 UNCITRAL Rule
- B Commentary
- (1) Discretion to make separate awards—Article 34(1)
- (2) The award is “final and binding” and the parties must “carry out the award without delay”—Article 34(2)
- (3) Written award and designation of the date and place of the award's making—Article 34(2) and (4)
- (4) Obligation to sign and failure to sign the award—Article 34(4)
- (5) Statement of reasons for the award and dissenting opinions—Article 34(3)
- (6) Publication of the award—Article 34(5)
- (7) Copies of the award to the parties—Article 34(6)
- (8) Filing and registration of the award
- (9) Comparison to the 1976 UNCITRAL Rules
- C Extracts from the Practice of Investment and other Tribunals
- D Extracts from the Practice of the Iran–US Claims Tribunal
- (1) Tribunal Rules (1983), Article 32(1)—Types of awards
- (2) Tribunal Rules (1983), Article 32(2)—Final and binding award
- (3) Tribunal Rules (1983), Article 32(3) and (4)—Date, place, and signature
- (4) Tribunal Rules (1983), Article 32(3)—Reasons for the award
- (5) Tribunal Rules (1983), Article 32(4)—Failure to sign the award
- (6) Tribunal Rules (1983), Article 32(5)—Publication of the award
- Ch.25 Settlement and other Grounds for Termination
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Settlement and other Termination—Article 36
- A Text of the 2010 UNCITRAL Rule
- B Commentary
- C Extracts from the Practice of Investment Tribunals
- D Extracts from the Practice of the Iran–US Claims Tribunal
- Ch.26 Post-Award Proceedings
- Ch.27 The Costs of Arbitration
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Costs of Arbitration—Article 40
- A Text of the 2010 UNCITRAL Rule
- B Commentary
- C Extracts from the Practice of Investment and other Tribunals
- 3 Arbitrators’ Fees—Article 41
- A Text of the 2010 UNCITRAL Rule
- B Commentary
- C Extracts from the Practice of Investment Tribunals
- 4 Apportionment of Costs—Article 42
- A Text of the 2010 UNCITRAL Rule
- B Commentary
- C Extracts from the Practice of Investment Tribunals
- D Extracts from the Practice of the Iran-US Claims Tribunal
- 5 Deposit of Costs—Article 43
- Ch.1 Introduction
- Further Material
- Appendix 1 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (as revised in 2010)
- Resolution adopted by the General Assembly [ on the report of the Sixth Committee (A/65/465 )]
- UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (as revised in 2010)
- s.I Introductory Rules
- s.II Composition of the Arbitral Tribunal
- s.III Arbitral Proceedings
- General provisions
- Place of arbitration
- Language
- Statement of claim
- Statement of defence
- Amendments to the claim or defence
- Pleas as to the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal
- Further written statements
- Periods of time
- Interim measures
- Evidence
- Hearings
- Experts appointed by the arbitral tribunal
- Default
- Closure of hearings
- Waiver of right to object
- s.IV The Award
- Annex
- Appendix 2 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (1976)
- General Assembly Resolution 31/98
- 1976 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (adopted December 15, 1976)
- s.I Introductory Rules
- s.II Composition of the arbitral tribunal
- s.III Arbitral proceedings
- General provisions
- Place of arbitration
- Language
- Statement of claim
- Statement of defence
- Amendments to the claim or defence
- Pleas as to the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal
- Further written statements
- Periods of time
- Evidence and hearings
- Evidence and hearings
- Interim measures of protection
- Experts
- Default
- Closure of hearings
- Waiver of rules
- s.IV The award
- Appendix 3 A Tabular Comparison of the 1976–2010 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules
- Appendix 4 UNCITRAL Notes on Organizing Arbitral Proceedings (May 28–June 14, 1996)
- Preface
- Introduction
- Purpose of the Notes
- Non-binding character of the Notes
- Discretion in conduct of proceedings and usefulness of timely decisions on organizing proceedings
- Multi-party arbitration
- Process of making decisions on organizing arbitral proceedings
- List of matters for possible consideration in organizing arbitral proceedings
- List of Matters For Possible Consideration In Organizing Arbitral Proceedings—Annotations
- 1 Set of arbitration rules
- 2 Language of proceedings
- 3 Place of arbitration
- 4 Administrative services that may be needed for the arbitral tribunal to carry out its functions
- 5 Deposits in respect of costs
- 6 Confidentiality of information relating to the arbitration; possible agreement thereon
- 7 Routing of written communications among the parties and the arbitrators
- 8 Telefax and other electronic means of sending documents
- 9 Arrangements for the exchange of written submissions
- 10 Practical details concerning written submissions and evidence (e. g. method of submission, copies, numbering, references)
- 11 Defining points at issue; order of deciding issues; defining relief or remedy sought
- 12 Possible settlement negotiations and their effect on scheduling proceedings
- 13 Documentary evidence
- (a) Time-limits for submission of documentary evidence intended to be submitted by the parties; consequences of late submission
- (b) Whether the arbitral tribunal intends to require a party to produce documentary evidence
- (c) Should assertions about the origin and receipt of documents and about the correctness of photocopies be assumed as accurate
- (d) Are the parties willing to submit jointly a single set of documentary evidence
- (e) Should voluminous and complicated documentary evidence be presented through summaries, tabulations, charts, extracts or samples
- 14 Physical evidence other than documents
- 15 Witnesses
- 59
- (a) Advance notice about a witness whom a party intends to present; written witnesses’ statements
- (b) Manner of taking oral evidence of witnesses
- (i) Order in which questions will be asked and the manner in which the hearing of witnesses will be conducted
- (ii) Whether oral testimony will be given under oath or affirmation and, if so, in what form an oath or affirmation should be made
- (iii) May witnesses be in the hearing room when they are not testifying
- (c) The order in which the witnesses will be called
- (d) Interviewing witnesses prior to their appearance at a hearing
- (e) Hearing representatives of a party
- 16 Experts and expert witnesses
- 17 Hearings
- (a) Decision whether to hold hearings
- (b) Whether one period of hearings should be held or separate periods of hearings
- (c) Setting dates for hearings
- (d) Whether there should be a limit on the aggregate amount of time each party will have for oral arguments and questioning witnesses
- (e) The order in which the parties will present their arguments and evidence
- (f) Length of hearings
- (g) Arrangements for a record of the hearings
- (h) Whether and when the parties are permitted to submit notes summarizing their oral arguments
- 18 Multi-party arbitration
- 19 Possible requirements concerning filing or delivering the award
- Endnotes
- Appendix 5 The Tribunal Rules of Procedure Provisionally adopted May 3, 1983, as amended May 27, 1997
- Introduction and Definitions
- s.I: Introductory Rules
- s.II: Composition of the Arbitral Tribunal
- s.III: Arbitral Proceedings
- Art.15 General Provisions
- Art.16 Place of Arbitration
- Art.17 Language
- Art.18 Statement of Claim
- Art.19 Statement of Defence
- Art.20 Amendments to the Claim or Defence
- Art.21 Pleas as to the Jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal
- Art.22 Further Written Statements
- Art.23 Periods of Time
- Art.24 Evidence and Hearings
- Art.25 Evidence and Hearings
- Art.26 Interim Measures of Protection
- Art.27 Experts
- Art.28 Default
- Art.29 Closure of Hearings
- Art.30 Waiver of Rules
- Art.31 Decisions
- Art.32 Form and Effect of Award
- Art.33 Applicable Law
- Art.34 Settlement or Other Grounds for Termination
- Art.35 Interpretation of the Award
- Art.36 Correction of the Award
- Art.37 Additional Award
- Art.38 Costs
- Art.39 Costs
- Art.40 Costs
- Art.41 Deposit of Costs
- Appendix 6 UNCITRAL
- Recommendations to assist arbitral institutions and other interested bodies with regard to arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules as revised in 2010
- A Introduction
- B Adoption of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules as the institutional rules of arbitral institutions or other interested bodies
- C Arbitral institutions and other interested bodies administering arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules or providing some administrative services
- D Arbitral institution acting as appointing authority
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 1 Designating and appointing authorities (article 6)
- (b) Failure to act: substitute appointing authority (article 6, paragraph 4)
- 2 Appointment of arbitrators
- (a) Appointment of a sole arbitrator (article 7, paragraph 2, and article 8)
- (b) Appointment of a three member arbitral tribunal (article 9)
- (c) Multiple claimants or respondents (article 10)
- (d) Successful challenge and other reasons for replacement of an arbitrator (articles 12 and 13)
- (e) Note for institutions acting as an appointing authority
- 3 Decision on challenge of arbitrator
- 4 Replacement of an arbitrator (article 14)
- 5 Assistance in fixing fees of arbitrators
- 7 Advisory comments regarding deposits
- Recommendations to assist arbitral institutions and other interested bodies with regard to arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules as revised in 2010
- Select Bibliography
- Index
- Appendix 1 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (as revised in 2010)
- [3.234.211.61]
- 3.234.211.61
