Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation

Part IV Extraterritoriality and US Law, 21 ‘Bridging the Gap’:

Vincent Smith

From: Extraterritoriality and Collective Redress

Edited By: Duncan Fairgrieve, Eva Lein

From: Oxford Legal Research Library (http://olrl.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved.date: 25 September 2021

Subject(s):
Collective redress — Jurisdictional agreements and the Brussels Regulation
21.01 The Morrison1 judgment from the United States Supreme Court highlights the legal limits to the territorial reach of United States federal civil law in the securities field, in particular where foreign plaintiffs sue foreign defendants in relation to activities on foreign (ie non-United States) markets (so-called F-cubed cases). 21.02 The Supreme Court had also previously ruled on the extraterritorial reach of United States civil law in the anti-trust (competition law) field in its Empagran2 judgment—also restraining the reach of United States law in F-cubed...
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.