Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation

4 China

Jingzhou Tao

From: Choice of Venue in International Arbitration

Edited By: Michael Ostrove, Claudia Salomon, Bette Shifman

From: Oxford Legal Research Library (http://olrl.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2022. All Rights Reserved.date: 26 June 2022

Judges — Arbitral rules — Recognition and enforcement — Awards — Place of arbitration

This chapter evaluates the merits of China as a venue for international arbitration proceedings. It discusses the history and development of arbitration in China; the processes and rules involved as well as the role of courts in the conduct of arbitration proceedings; and rules for arbitral awards. It concludes for foreign investors, arbitration is a better choice than litigation to resolve disputes. Choosing a Chinese arbitration commission instead of the People's Court not only provides the common advantages of arbitration, but also better shields the foreign party from the strong local protectionism in the local judiciary and from the professional incompetence of some judges. More importantly, arbitral awards rendered by arbitration institutions in China are more easily recognized and enforced in other countries than judgments issued by Chinese courts, as China is a signatory to the New York Convention, but has not yet entered into to judgment recognition and enforcement treaties with most of the major world economies.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.