Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation

Part II Non-Contractual Obligations Arising Out of Tort/Delict, 9 Industrial Action

From: The Rome II Regulation: The Law Applicable to Non-Contractual Obligations: Updating Supplement

Andrew Dickinson

From: Oxford Legal Research Library (http://olrl.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 27 October 2020

Subject(s):
Rome I Regulation and choice of law — Applicable law — Types of damages — Exclusion or limit of liability — Industrial action
9.12 (n 22) Add K Apps, ‘Damages Claims against Trade Unions after Viking and Laval’ (2009) Eur L Rev 141. 9.13 (n 25) The ECJ’s decision in the Viking Line case is reported at [2007] ECR I-10779. 9.15 (n 27) The ECJ’s decision in the Laval case is reported at [2007] ECR I-11767. 9.19 (n 27) The ECJ’s decision in the Laval case is reported at [2007] ECR I-11767. Line 3—Insert footnote after ‘autonomous meaning’ For criticism of this approach, see G Palao Moreno, ‘The Law Applicable to a Non-Contractual Obligation with Respect to an Industrial Action: A Commentary...
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.