Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
The Rome II Regulation: The Law Applicable to Non-Contractual Obligations - Updating Supplement by Dickinson, Andrew (24th June 2010)

Part IV Freedom of Choice and Common Rules, 13 Choosing the Law Applicable to Non-Contractual Obligations

From: The Rome II Regulation: The Law Applicable to Non-Contractual Obligations: Updating Supplement

Andrew Dickinson

From: Oxford Legal Research Library (http://olrl.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 30 May 2020

Subject(s):
Applicable law — Rome I Regulation and choice of law — Choice of law clauses — Illegality and contract — Validity of contract — Scope of the law applicable under the Rome II Regulation
13.06 Insert footnote 15A at end of paragraph For comment on the reasoning underlying Art 14 and its provisions, see T M de Boer, ‘Party Autonomy and its Limitations in the Rome II Regulation’ (2008) 9 YPIL 19. 13.13 (n 38) The quotation from the ECJ’s judgment in Hugo Trumpy is from paras 48–9, 51. 13.18 (n 53) Add Also P Bertoli, ‘Choice of Law by the Parties in the Rome II Regulation’ (2009) 92 Rivista di diritto internationale‎ 697, 708. 13.20 (n 62) Insert at beginning Also P Bertoli, 13.18 above, 703, fn (21). (n 63) Add Also 1.04 above. cf G Palao Moreno,...
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.