Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
Defining Issues in International Arbitration - Celebrating 100 Years of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators edited by Betancourt, Julio César

Part V Emergency Arbitrators and Interim Relief, 15 Legal Standards Applicable to Deciding Applications for Interim Relief

Grant Hanessian

From: Defining Issues in International Arbitration: Celebrating 100 Years of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators

Edited By: Julio César Betancourt

From: Oxford Legal Research Library (http://olrl.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 23 October 2019

Subject(s):
Jurisdiction — Claims — Recognition and enforcement — International courts and tribunals, procedure

Parties in a dispute sometimes need to obtain relief prior to the final disposition of the case. Such relief-in international arbitration variously termed ‘interim measures of protection’, ‘conservatory measures’, or ‘provisional’, ‘preliminary’, or ‘temporary’ relief-may be necessary to preserve the status quo, to facilitate conduct of arbitral proceedings, or to ensure enforcement of a future award. In recent years, interim relief has received more attention and it has become increasingly possible to identify international standards relevant to applications for interim relief. This chapter considers these emerging standards, with particular emphasis on contributions made by the decisions of investor-state tribunals and emergency arbitrators.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.