Part V The Broader View and the Future of MiFID, 23 Investment-Based Crowdfunding: Is MiFID II Enough?
Guido Ferrarini, Eugenia Macchiavello
Edited By: Danny Busch, Guido Ferrarini
- Equity — Primary market — Underwriting — Authorisation — Conduct of business regulation — Investment business — Supervision — European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA)
This chapter explores the policy and regulatory issues generated by investment-based crowdfunding in Europe. Firstly, it argues that crowdfunding raises serious investor protection concerns, particularly when directed to retail investors. As governments try to stimulate innovation and the formation of new enterprises, a trade-off is created between investor protection and economic growth. The laws of the EU and its Member States try to solve this trade-off in different ways, as the chapter shows with reference to MiFID and the laws of the UK, France, Italy, Spain and Germany. Secondly, it shows that MiFID II, while enhancing investor protection and furthering harmonization, does not create all the conditions needed for a pan-European crowdfunding market. At the same time, MiFID II narrows the potential for exemptions under which some Member States have adopted special regimes for crowdfunding, therefore restricting the scope for an enabling approach to investment-based crowdfunding at national level.