Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation

Part II To Arbitrate or Not to Arbitrate? The Grey Area of Contracts of Carriage, 6 The Modern International Conventions Governing the Carriage of Goods by Sea: The Lonely Exceptions to the Maritime Law’s Widespread Preference for Arbitration

Michael F. Sturley

From: The Role of Arbitration in Shipping Law

Edited By: Miriam Goldby, Loukas Mistelis

From: Oxford Legal Research Library (http://olrl.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 30 October 2020

Subject(s):
Arbitration

The two most recent international conventions governing the carriage of goods by sea—the Hamburg Rules and the Rotterdam Rules—include provisions that limit the enforcement of arbitration clauses in international commercial transactions. This chapter examines the arbitration provisions of those two recent conventions, explaining the theory behind their unusual approach. Although the arbitration provisions may seem illogical when considered in isolation, when examined in context they form a sensible part of a larger regime. Critics may question the policy choices that have been made in crafting those regimes, but those choices were largely driven by commercial considerations as affected stakeholders agreed on a compromise solution to a practical problem. In the end, the arbitration provisions are a sensible way to give effect to those policy choices.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.