Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
International Commercial Arbitration in New York, 2nd Edition edited by Carter, James H; Fellas, John

2 The Impact of U.S. Litigation

Oliver J. Armas, Thomas N. Pieper

From: International Commercial Arbitration in New York (2nd Edition)

Edited By: James H. Carter, John Fellas

From: Oxford Legal Research Library (http://olrl.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 10 July 2020

Subject(s):
Jurisdiction — Arbitrators — Conduct of proceedings

This chapter provides an account of some of the salient aspects of the U.S. legal system that will help non-U.S. readers identify the “litigation baggage” U.S. lawyers may bring to an international arbitration. U.S.-trained lawyers acting as counsel or arbitrators in such cases will naturally bring with them into arbitration certain expectations that flow from their U.S. litigation experience (i.e., the so-called “litigation baggage”), which may differ from those of their non-U.S. trained colleagues. This is a direct product of the adversarial model employed by the U.S. common-law legal system. In the adversarial model, the lawyers take control of the litigation as advocates through much of the process. U.S. litigators will seek to be more involved in case management, feel greater entitlement to broad discovery, and prepare for a witness-oriented hearing.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.