Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation

Part I Commentary on the ICDR International Rules, 36 Article 36—Deposits

Martin F Gusy, James M Hosking

From: A Guide to the ICDR International Arbitration Rules (2nd Edition)

Martin F. Gusy, James M. Hosking

From: Oxford Legal Research Library (http://olrl.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved.date: 23 January 2021

Arbitration — Counterclaims — Costs and expenses

This chapter assesses Article 36 of the ICDR Rules. Article 36 sets out the basic rules for when deposits are to be paid as an advance on the costs of the arbitration, the consequences for non-payment, and the Administrator’s duty to account to the parties for how the deposits have been used. The advance on costs is strategically important because, unlike in litigation, it requires the parties to ‘front’ potentially significant sums in order to continue to have the dispute resolved by arbitration. This can be used by either party to try to gain leverage. The text of Article 36 was the subject of several revisions with the 2014 amendments to the ICDR Rules. A new paragraph was added to the Article, making explicit that a party’s failure to pay a required deposit can be treated as a withdrawal of the party’s claim or counterclaim.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.