Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
A Guide to the ICDR International Arbitration Rules, 2nd Edition by Gusy, Martin F; Hosking, James M (21st February 2019)

Part I Commentary on the ICDR International Rules, 28 Article 28—Waiver

Martin F Gusy, James M Hosking

From: A Guide to the ICDR International Arbitration Rules (2nd Edition)

Martin F. Gusy, James M. Hosking

From: Oxford Legal Research Library (http://olrl.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 23 October 2019

Subject(s):
Arbitrators — Waiver

This chapter assesses Article 28 of the ICDR Rules. It is not uncommon for a party to raise objections to the arbitration based on non-compliance with the relevant institutional rules. However, when not raised promptly, such an objection can derail an arbitral proceeding and create potential grounds on which to challenge the award. Article 28 requires that where a party knows of any non-compliance with the ICDR Rules or the parties’ arbitration agreement, but instead proceeds with the arbitration without promptly objecting in writing, it will be deemed to have waived the right to object. This general principle is also echoed in the ICDR Rules in the specific context of challenges to arbitrators and objections to jurisdiction. Ultimately, the revisions to Article 28 in the 2014 ICDR Rules reflect best practices in international arbitration and potentially broaden the effect of the waiver provision.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.