Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments in Europe - The Brussels I Regulation, the Lugano Convention, and the Hague Choice of Court Convention by Hartley, Trevor C (20th July 2017)

Part II Jurisdiction, 14 Submission

From: Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments in Europe: The Brussels I Regulation, the Lugano Convention, and the Hague Choice of Court Convention

Trevor C Hartley

From: Oxford Legal Research Library (http://olrl.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 17 October 2019

Subject(s):
Consent in private international law — Establishing jurisdiction — Set off and counterclaim

This chapter considers the rules on submission. If the defendant enters an appearance before a court of a Member State (Lugano State) without contesting jurisdiction, that fact alone confers jurisdiction on the court in question. This ensures that a defendant cannot fight the case on the merits and then, if he loses, claim that the court had no jurisdiction. The rule is usually explained on the ground that the entry of an appearance without challenging the court's jurisdiction constitutes an implied choice-of-court agreement. The rule can also apply against the claimant. If the defendant claims set-off and the claimant contests the substance of that claim without challenging the jurisdiction of the court regarding the claim to be set off, that fact alone will confer jurisdiction.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.