Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation

5 Powers, Duties, and Jurisdiction of an Arbitral Tribunal

Nigel Blackaby, Constantine Partasides QC, Alan Redfern, Martin Hunter

From: Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration (6th Edition)

Nigel Blackaby, Constantine Partasides, Alan Redfern, Martin Hunter

A newer edition of Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration is available. Latest edition (7 ed.)
Previous Edition (5 ed.) Next Edition: 7th Edition Latest edition (7 ed.)

From: Oxford Legal Research Library (http://olrl.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2022. All Rights Reserved.date: 06 December 2022

Arbitral rules — Arbitrators — Recognition and enforcement

This chapter discusses an arbitral tribunal’s different powers, duties, and jurisdiction during arbitration proceedings. These arise from a complex mixture of the will of the parties, the law governing the arbitration agreement, the law of the place of arbitration, and the law of the place where recognition or enforcement of the award is to be sought. Parties confer powers upon the tribunal either directly or indirectly. A direct conferment occurs when the parties agree upon the powers that they wish the arbitrators to exercise, while indirect conferment happens when parties agree that the arbitration is to be conducted under pre-established rules. The chapter then describes the duties of an arbitrator, which may be divided into three categories: duties imposed by the parties; duties imposed by law; and ethical duties. Both the powers and duties comprise a tribunal’s jurisdiction, with the parties determining the extent of its validity.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.