Re Macks; Ex parte Saint (2000) 204 CLR 158 (HCA) 1.01

Oberster Gerichtshof Österreich, 14 July 1993 (1998) 125 JDI 993 1.n46

Re Registration in Austria of a Branch of an English Company S v Companies Registrar, Graz (Case number 6Ob 124/99z) [2001] 1 CMLR 38 3.20

Belgian Cass 12 November 1965, Soc Lamot Ltd c Willy Lamot (1967) 56 RCDIP 506 1.30

CA Brussels 8 April 2004, http://www.cass.be/juris/jurf.htm 6.71

Comm Brussels 12 December 2003, SPRL Eurogyp, reported in B Wessels, International Insolvency Law (Kluwer 2006) vol X, p 316 6.60

Electra Airlines Compagnie reported in B Wessels, International Insolvency Law (Kluwer 2006) vol X, p 316 6.60

National Trust Co v Ebro Irrigation & Power Ltd [1954] Ont L Rep 463 (Ont SC) 1.01

Re Stanford Bank International Ltd 2009 CarswellQue 9216 (Super Ct Quebec) [35], aff’d 2009 CarswellQue 13051 (CA Quebec) 6.152–6.155

Zayed v Cook 2009 CarswellOnt 8079, 62 CBR (5th) 114 (Super Ct Just Ont) 6.n222

Re Parmalat Capital Finance Ltd [2004–05] CILR 22 (Grand Court of the Cayman Islands) 6.54

Apostolides v Orams, Case C-420/07 [2009] ECR I-3571 2.n8

Arblade and Leloup, Joined Cases C-369 & 376/96 [1999] ECR I-8453 3.47, 4.36

Bier v Mines de Potasse d’Alsace, Case C-21/76 [1976] ECR 1735 2.n30

Cadbury Schweppes v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, Case C-196/04 [2006] ECR I-7995 4.02, 4.46–4.54, 4.62, 4.70–4.76, 4.85–4.91, 4.95, 4.99, 5.90, 5.92, 7.53

Caixa-Bank France v Ministre de l’Économie, Case C-442/02 [2004] ECR I-8961 3.124

Cartesio Oktató és Szolgátató bt, Case C-210/06 [2008] ECR I-9641 3.50, 3.141–3.195, 3.199–3.201, 3.n256, 4.63, 4.n103, 5.69, 5.74, 5.79, 5.92, 5.97, 6.105, 6.106, 7.85, 7.99, 7.100, 7.109, 7.111, 7.n156, 9.13

Cassis de Dijon case see Rewe v Bundesmonopolverwaltung für Branntwein

Centros Ltd v Erhvervs- og Selskabsstyrelsen, Case C-212/97 [1999] ECR I-1459. 3.16–3.27, 3.30, 3.34–3.35, 3.59–3.62, 3.69, 3.76, 3.153–3.155, 3.177–3.179, 3.n49, 4.01, 4.05, 4.31, 4.49–4.57, 4.61, 4.68–4.70, 4.78–4.80, 4.83–4.84, 4.90–4.92, 4.96, 4.99, 4.101–4.102, 5.91, 5.95, 5.98, 6.70, 6.91–6.92, 6.109, 7.90, 7.124

Commission v Austria, Case C-147/03 [2005] ECR I-5969 3.25

Commission v France, Case C-270/83 [1986] ECR 273 3.04, 4.86

Commission v Portugal, Case C-38/10 [2010] OJ C80/18 3.171

Commission v United Kingdom, Case C-246/89 [1991] ECR I-4585 4.49

Daily Mail case see R v HM Treasury and Commissioners of Inland Revenue

Danner, Case C-136/00 [2002] ECR I-8147 4.86

Dansommer v Götz, Case C-8/98 [2000] ECR I-393 2.15

Dassonville see Procureur du Roi v Dassonville

de Lasteyrie du Saillant v Ministère de l’Économie , Case C-9/02[2004] ECR I-2409 3.25, 5.100, 7.126

Diamantis v Greece , Case C-373/97[2000] ECR I-1705 3.26, 7.124

Emsland-Stärke GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas , Case C-110/99[2000] ECR I-11569 3.26, 7.53, 7.124

Erich Gasser GmbH v MISAT Srl , Case C-116/02[2003] I-14693 3.n266, 7.39

Eurofood IFSC, Case C-341/04 [2006] ECR I-3813 4.02, 4.44, 4.104, 5.93, 6.06–6.14, 6.61–6.62, 6.64, 6.82–6.83, 6.122, 6.125, 6.131, 6.145, 6.148, 6.150, 6.155–6.156, 6.172, 6.n129, 8.29

(p. xvii) Eurowings Luftverkehr AG v Finanzamt Dortmund-Unna , Case C-294/97[1999] ECR I-7447 3.25

Freeport v Arnoldsson , Case C-98/06[2007] ECR I-8319 7.62, 7.n55

Garcia Avello v Belgium , Case C-148/02[2003] ECR I-11613 3.109

Gebhard v Consiglio dell’Ordine degli Avvocati e Procuratori di Milano , Case C-55/94[1995] ECR I-4165 3.18, 3.33, 3.68, 3.71, 3.105, 3.145, 3.157, 3.195, 4.49, 4.88, 4.102, 5.65, 5.77, 6.109, 7.53

GIE Groupe Concorde v Master of the Vessel Suhadiwarno Panjan , Case C-440/97[1999] ECR I-6307 7.39

Glaxo Wellcome v Finanzamt München II , Case C-182/08[2009] ECR I-8591 4.88, 4.n108

Grunkin and Paul v Grunkin-Paul and Standesamt Stadt Niebüll , Case C-353/08[2008] ECR I-7639 3.87–140, 3.174, 6.105, 6.n160

Hassett v South Eastern Health Board and Doherty v North Western Health Board, Case C-372/07[2008] ECR I-7403 2.09–2.13, 2.16

ICI v Colmer , Case C-264/96[1998] ECR I-4695 3.25

Ingmar GB Ltd v Eaton Leonard Technologies Inc , Case C-381/98[2000] ECR I-9305 3.48

Innoventif, Case C-453/04 [2006] ECR I-4929 3.72

Inspire Art case see Kamer van Koophandel en Fabrieken voor Amsterdam v Inspire Art Ltd

Interedil Srl (in liquidation) v Fallimento Interedil Srl , Case C-396/09[2011] ECR (not yet published) 6.06, 6.15–6.22, 6.27, 6.29–6.30, 6.43, 6.47, 6.62, 6.65, 7.45, 7.61, 7.90, 7.101, 7.103–7.104, 7.n94, 8.07

The International Transport Workers’ Federation and the Finnish Seamen’s Union v Viking Line ABP and OÜ Viking Line Eesti, Case C-438/05 [2007] ECR I-10779 4.n44

Kalfelis v Bankhaus Schröder, Münchmeyer, Hengst and Co , Case C-189/87[1988] ECR 5565 2.22

Kamer van Koophandel en Fabrieken voor Amsterdam v Inspire Art Ltd, Case C-167/01 [2003] ECR I-10155 3.55–3.79, 3.149, 3.154–3.155, 4.01–4.02, 4.05, 4.15, 4.56, 4.68, 4.n94, 5.64, 5.67, 5.73–5.74, 5.n108, 6.102, 6.109, 7.129

Keck and Mithouard, Joined Cases C-267/91 and C-268/91 [1993] ECR I-6097 3.124, 3.n252

Lankhorst-Hohorst GmbH v Finanzamt Steinfurt , Case C-324/00[2002] ECR I-11779 3.25, 7.126

Laval un Partneri v Svenska Byggnadsarbetareförbundet, Case C-341/05 [2007] ECR I-11767 4.n44

(p. xviii) Lechouritou v Germany, Case C-292/05 [2007] ECR I-151 3.n266

Lenz v Finanzlandesdirektion fur Tirol, Case C-315/02 [2004]ECR I-7063 3.25

Metallgesellschaft/Hoechst AG v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, Joined Cases C-397 & 410/98 [2001] ECR I-1727 3.25

MG Probud Gdynia, Case C-444/07 [2010] ECR I-417 6.n12

Mazzoleni and ISA, Case C-165/98 [2001] ECR I-2189 4.37

Owusu, Case C-281/02 [2005] ECR I-1383 2.n8

Payroll Data Services, Case C-79/01[2002] ECR I-8923. 3.77–3.78

Planzer Luxembourg, Case C-73/06 [2007] ECR I-5655 4.02, 4.45

Procureur du Roi v Dassonville, Case 8/74 [1974] ECR 837 3.123, 3.n252

R v HM Treasury and Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex p Daily Mail, Case C-81/87[1988] ECR 5483 3.05–3.15, 3.23, 3.30, 3.32–3.35, 3.41, 3.59, 3.63, 3.70, 3.79–3.81, 3.84–3.86, 3.141, 3.149, 3.151–3.157, 3.160, 3.163, 3.168–3.169, 3.176–3.178, 3.180, 3.190, 3.201, 4.55–4.56, 4.58, 5.102, 6.94, 6.n164, 7.85, 7.100, 7.106, 7.108–7.109

R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame and Others, Case C-221/89[1991] ECR I-3905 4.49

Rewe v Bundesmonopolverwaltung für Branntwein, Case C-120/78[1979] ECR 649 3.47, 3.n252

Reyners v Belgium, Case C-2/74[1974] ECR 631 4.49, 4.88

Roche Nederland v Primus and Goldenberg, Case C-539/03[2006] ECR I-6535 2.22, 7.39

Rush Portuguesa v Office National d’ Immigration, Case C-113/89[1990] ECR I-1417 4.36

Sanders v van der Putte, Case C-73/77[1977] ECR 2383 2.15

Schmidberger v Austria, Case C-112/00 [2003] I-5659 3.n194

Seagon v Deko Marty Belgium NV, Case C-339/07[2009] ECR I-767 7.24, 7.40

Sevic Systems, C-411/03 [2005] ECR I-10805 3.79–3.86, 3.154–3.155, 3.176, 3.188–3.194, 3.201, 7.121

Seco v EVI, Joined Cases C-62 & 63/81 [1982] ECR 223 4.36

Segers v Bestuur van de Bedrijfsvereniging voor Bank- en Verzekeringswezen, Case C-79/85[1986] ECR 2375 3.04, 3.12

Skandia and Ramstedt v Riksskatteverket, Case C-422/01[2003] ECR I-6817 4.86

Staubitz-Schreiber, Case C-1/04 [2006] ECR I-701 7.45, 7.61, 7.104, 7.n34

Test Claimants in the Thin Cap Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland. Revenue (UK), Case C-524/04 [2007] ECR I-2107 4.n108

(p. xix) Turner v Grovit, Case C-159/02[2004] ECR I-3565 3.n266, 7.39

TV 10 SA v Commissariaat voor de Media, Case C-23/93[1994] ECR I-4795 3.24, 4.54, 4.78–4.80, 4.83–4.84

Überseering BV v Nordic Construction Company Baumanagement GmbH, Case C-208/00[2002] ECR I-9919 3.12, 3.27–3.54, 3.59, 3.63, 3.69, 3.76, 3.79, 3.88, 3.97, 3.102–3.108, 3.111, 3.126, 3.136–3.137, 3.140, 3.141, 3.149, 3.154–3.155, 3.159, 3.162, 3.166–3.168, 3.183, 4.15, 5.73–5.74, 5.77, 5.n108, 6.94–6.95, 6.97, 6.102, 6.107, 6.109, 7.84, 7.100

VALE Épitési Kft, Case C-378/10 [2010] OJ C317/13 3.196–3.199, 3.196–3.205

Van Binsbergen v Bedrijfsvereniging Metaalnijverheid, Case C-33/74[1974] ECR 1299 3.24, 4.81–4.83

Vander Elst v Office des Migrations Internationales, Case C-43/93[1994] ECR I-3803 4.36

X & Y v Riksskatteverket, Case C-436/00[2002] ECR I-10829 3.25, 4.49

Zhu and Chen v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Case C-200/02 [2004] ECR I-9925 3.n114

Cass Ass 21 December 1990, Directeur général des impôts c Soc Roval (1992) 81 RCDIP 70–72 1.17, 6.91

Cass civ 18 March 1878, Princesse de Bauffremont c Prince de Bauffremont (1878) 5 JDI 505 7.16, 7.n36

Cass civ 21 November 1889, (1889) 16 JDI 850 4.59

Cass civ 22 December 1896, (1897) 24 JDI 364 4.59

Cass civ 7 July 1947, Compagnie du Cambodge c Administration de l’Enregistrement (1949) 38 RCDIP 78 1.14, 1.16, 1.n57

Cass civ 22 January 1951, Époux Weiller (1951) 40 RCDIP 167 7.17

Cass civ 15 May 1963, Patiño c Dame Patiño (1964) 53 RCDIP 532 7.17

Cass civ 7 January 1964, Munzer c Dame Munzer (1964) 53 RCDIP 344 7.17

Cass civ 30 March 1971, Caisse centrale de reassurance des mutuelles agricoles c Mutuelle centrale d’assurances et de reassurance des mutuelles agricoles et société générale (1971) 60 RCDIP 451 1.15

Cass civ 17 May 1983, Soc Lafarge (1983) 72 RCDIP 346 7.16

Cass civ 6 February 1985, Mme Fairhurst c Simitch (1985) 74 RCDIP 243 7.17

(p. xx) Cass civ 24 November 1987 Garrett (1988) 77 RCDIP 364 7.17, 7.n22, 7.n35

Cass civ 6 June 1990 Akla (1991) 80 RCDIP 593 7.17

Cass civ (2) 15 October 1999, Mme XY, http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr 7.47

Cass com 5 December 1989, Société Extraco Anstalt (1991) 80 RCDIP 669 3.n124

Cass comm 18 October 1994, Paul Guez c Soc Emerson Europe SA, http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/ 1.18

Cass comm 28 October 2008 http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/ 4.n97

Cass com 27 October 2009, SARL Europe Motor Automobile c Berti, http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr 3.201

Cass crim 12 November 1990, Voarick et autres c Société Extraco Anstalt, (1991) 80 RCDIP 671 3.n124

Cass crim 31 January 2007, La Société Elf Aquitaine, http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/ 1.18, 1.32

Cass soc 3 March 2004, Mme X c Soc Ural Hudson Ltd, http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/ 1.17, 2.08

CE Ass 29 June 1973, Syndicat général du personnel de la Compagnie des Wagons-lits (1974) 63 RCDIP 344 3.n201

CE 22 February 1960, Société Mayol Arbona et Cie, (1960) 49 RCDIP 335 1.14

CA Douai 2 May 2006, Soc Trading Logistics Mediations International Ltd, www.legifrance.gouv.fr 6.60, 6.72

CA Paris 21 May 1957, Banque Franco-serbe c Danske-Landmarndsbank (1958) 47 RCDIP 128 1.15

CA Versailles 4 September 2003, SAS ISA Daisytek, aff’d Cass comm 27 June 2006 SAS Isa Daisytek at http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr 6.74, 6.85, 8.29

Comm Nanterre 19 May 2005, SAS ROVER France, http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr, aff’d Public Prosecutor v Segard (As Administrator for Rover France SAS) [2006] ILPr 32 (CA Versailles) 6.74–6.75, 7.n87

Cour de Dijon (2) 24 November 1909, (1910) 37 JDI 892 4.59

Trib civ Lille (1) 21 May 1908, Vanverts c West Canadian Collieries Ltd (1909) 36 JDI 191 4.60–61, 4.64–4.66

Trib corr Seine (10) 27 October 1910, The Universal Gaz Methane and Buisson Ltd (1911) 38 JDI 234 4.60, 4.62, 5.49

Trib corr Seine (10) 2 July 1913, The Moulin-Rouge Attraction Ltd (1913) 40 JDI 1273 4.59

Re Energotech SARL [2007] BCC 123 (Tribunal de Grande Instance of Lure) 6.59, 6.60

(p. xxi) MPOTEC GmbH [2006] BCC 681 (Tribunal de Grande Instance de Nanterre) 6.86

BGH BGHZ 2001, 341 (German Federal Court of Cassation) 2.47

BGH BGHZ 2003, 185 (German Federal Court of Cassation) 3.53

German Imperial Court of Cassation, Judgment of 9 March 1904 (1905) 1 RCDIP 364 2.46

Hans Brochier Holdings Ltd, AG Nuremberg NZI 2007,185 6.59

Hettlage-Österreich, Judgment of 04.05.2004, AG Munich ZIP 2004,962 6.60, 6.86

Hukla-Werke, AG Offenburg NZI 2004,673 6.60

Kiel Court of First Instance, Judgment of 20 April 2006 5.73

2004,673PIN case, AG Cologne (2008) 27(7) Am Bankr Inst J 30 6.n74, 7.86, 7.88, 7.93–7.95, 8.29

Re Expatriation of A German Company [1993] 2 CMLR 801 (Bavarian Oberstes Landesgericht) 1.29

Greek Court of Cassation (Grand Chamber), Judgment No 2/2003 (2003) 54 Epitheorisi Emporikou Dikaiou 60 3.52

Parmalat Hungária Rt & Mliekotej sro, Fejér Municipality Court, ZInsO 2004,861 6.60, 6.82, 6.86

Cass SU 16 November 2000 n 14870 (2002) 38 RDIPP 193 (Italian Court of Cassation) 1.23

Cass SU 23 January 2004 n 1244, B&C Finanziaria (2005) 41 RDIPP 1381 (Italian Court of Cassation) 7.105–7.113

Cass SU 12 January 2005 n 385 (2005) RDIPP 801 (Italian Court of Cassation) 2.15

Cass SU 20 May 2005 n 10606 (2006) 42 RDIPP 432 (Italian Court of Cassation) 6.n23

Cass SU 16 February 2006 n 3368 (2006) 42 RDIPP 1074 (Italian Court of Cassation) 7.114

Trib Parma 4 February 2004, Parmalat Capital Netherlands BV (2004) 40 RDIPP 693 6.60, 6.73

(p. xxii) Trib Rome 14 August 2003, Cirio Del Monte NV [2004] Dir fall 1008 6.60

Silvarux SARL, Trib Luxembourg, 15 April 2005 6.60

BenQ Mobile Holding BV [2008] BCC 489 6.69, 6.76, 6.n98

Bluegrid Ltd, Stockholm District Court, 21 January 2005 6.60

Radaflex OY, CA Svea, 30 May 2003 6.60, 6.75

Re 3T Telecom Ltd [2006] 2 BCLC 137, Ch 6.60, 6.73, 6.82

Re ABC Coupler & Engineering Co (No 1) [1961] 1 WLR 243, Ch 6.54

Adams v National Bank of Greece and Athens SA [1961] AC 255, HL 7.n177

Agnew v Lansforsakringsbolagens AB [2001] 1 AC 223, HL 2.23

Re Aim Underwriting Agencies (Ireland) Ltd [2005] ILPr 22, Ch 6.60, 6.69, 6.73, 6.82

Re Alitalia Linee Aeree Italiane SpA [2011] EWHC 15, Ch; [2010] 1 All ER 81 6.161

The Atlantic Star [1973] QB 364, 382, CA 7.05–7.09, 7.23

Baccus SRL v Servicio Nacional del Trigo [1957] 1 QB 438, CA 1.03

Baden v Société Générale [1993] 1 WLR 509, Ch 6.32, 6.n55

Banco de Bilbao v Sancha and Rey [1938] 2 KB 176, CA 1.01, 1.03

Bank of Ethiopia v National Bank of Egypt and Liguori [1937] 3 All ER 8, Ch 1.01

Base Metal Trading Ltd v Shamurin [2004] EWCA Civ 1316, [2005] 1 WLR 1157 1.01

Boys v Chaplin [1971] AC 356, HL 7.03, 7.n35

Re BRAC Rent-A-Car International Inc [2003] 2 All ER 201, Ch 6.04, 6.60

Cadre Sa v Astra Asigurari Sa [2006] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 560 (QBD Comm) 7.10

Choudhary v Bhatter [2009] EWCA Civ 1176, [2010] ILPr 8 2.15

(p. xxiii) Re Ci4net.com Inc [2004] EWHC 1941, [2005] BCC 277, Ch 6.04, 6.60, 6.63, 6.67, 6.73, 6.137, 7.43

Re Collins & Aikman Corporation Group [2006] EWHC 1343, [2006] BCC 606, Ch 6.58, 6.60, 6.63, 6.83

Re Daisytek-ISA Ltd [2003] BCC 562, Ch 6.53, 6.60, 6.68, 6.84–6.85, 6.n115

De Beers Consolidated Mines Ltd v Howe (Surveyor of Taxes) [1906] 1 AC 455, HL 3.14, 5.n142

The Deichland [1990] 1 QB 361, CA 2.03

El-Ajou v Dollar Manhattan [2005] EWHC 2551, Ch 6.n101

Re English, Scottish & Australian Chartered Bank [1893] 3 Ch 385, CA 6.54

Re European Directories (DH6) BV [2010] EWHC 3472, Ch 7.n135

Eurosteel Ltd v Stinnes AG [2000] 1 All ER (Comm) 964 1.03

FKI Engineering Ltd v Dewind Holdings Limited [2007] EWHC 72 (Comm), [2007] ILPr 17 2.15

Re Gallery Capital SA (Ch, 21 April 2010) 6.n101, 7.n135

George Wimpey UK Ltd v VI Construction Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 77, 103 Con LR 67 6.24

Gerevan Trading Co Ltd v Skjevesland [2003] BCC 209, Ch, aff’d [2003] BCC 391, Ch 6.57–6.58

Grupo Torras SA v Al-Sabah [1996] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 7 2.15

Grupo Torras SA v Al-Sabah [2001] CLC 221, CA 1.01

Hans Brochier Holdings v Exner [2007] BCC 127, Ch 6.60

Re Hellas Telecommunications (Luxembourg) II SCA [2009] EWHC 3199, Ch 7.87, 7.89–7.91, 7.95, 7.138

Henriques v Dutch West India Co (1728) 2 LD Raym 1532, 92 ER 494 1.01

Item Software (UK) Ltd v Fassihi [2004] EWCA Civ 1244, [2004] BCC 994 5.n13

Janred Properties Ltd v ENIT [1989] 2 All ER 444 1.03

JH Rayner (Mincing Lane) Ltd v Department of Trade and Industry [1990] 2 AC 418, HL 1.03

JPMorgan Chase Bank v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe [2009] EWHC 1627 (Comm) 2.15

The Kommunar No 2 [1997] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 8 QB 1.03

Lazard Bros v Midland Bank [1933] AC 289, HL 1.01, 1.03

Re Leigh Estates (UK) Ltd [1994] BCC 292, Ch 6.54

Re Lennox Holdings plc [2009] BCC 155, Ch 6.63

Lubbe v Cape [2000] 1 WLR 1545, HL 7.n38

Masri v Consolidated Contractors International Co SAL [2008] EWCA Civ 625, [2009] 2 WLR 669 7.27

M’Elroy v M’Allister 1949 SC 110 7.04

(p. xxiv) Re MG Rover España SA [2006] BCC 599, Ch 7.n87, 8.29

National Bank of Greece and Athens SA v Metliss [1958] AC 509, HL 1.03, 7.n177

Re Norton’s Settlement [1908] 1 Ch 471, CA 7.n37

Official Receiver v Mitterfellner [2009] BPIR 1075, Ch 7.n72

Re Parkside Flexibles SA [2006] BCC 589, Ch 6.60

Peruvian Guano Co v Bockwoldt (1883) 23 ChD 225, CA 7.05

Phillips v Symes [2002] 1 WLR 853, Ch 2.15

Pickering v Stephenson (1872) LR 14 Eq 322, Ch 1.03

Pillar Securisation Sarl v Spicer & Shinners [2010] EWHC 836, Ch 6.04

Presentaciones Musicales SA v Secunda [1994] Ch 271, CA 1.03

Redgrave v Hurd (1881–82) LR 20 ChD 1, CA 6.40

The Rewia [1991] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 325, CA 2.03

Rubin & Anor v Eurofinance SA & Ors [2009] EWHC 2129, Ch 6.161

Rubin & Anor v Eurofinance SA & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 895, [2011] 2 WLR 121 6.161

St Pierre v South American Stores (Gath & Chaves) Ltd [1936] 1 KB 382, CA 7.n37

Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22, HL 6.24

Re Sendo Ltd [2006] 1 BCLC 395, Ch 6.04, 6.60

Shierson v Vlieland-Boddy [2005] EWCA Civ 974, [2005] 1 WLR 3966 6.25, 7.41–7.45

Sierra Leone Telecommunications Co Ltd v Barclays Bank plc [1998] 2 All ER 821, QB 1.01, 1.03

Speed Investments Ltd v Formula One Holdings Ltd (No 2) [2004] EWCA Civ 1512, [2005] 1 WLR 1936 2.15

Spiller v Turner [1897] 1 Ch 911, Ch 1.03

Re Stanford International Bank Ltd [2009] EWHC 1441, [2009] BPIR 1157, Ch; aff’d [2010] EWCA Civ 137, [2010] 3 WLR 941 6.30–6.33, 6.58, 6.63, 6.86, 6.147, 6.150–6.151, 6.155, 6.n55, 6.n101, 6.n219

Unit Construction Co Ltd v Bullock [1960] AC 351, HL 5.n142

In re Artimm Srl 335 BR 149, 159 (Bkrtcy CD Cal 2005) 6.138

Bank of Augusta v Earle 38 US 519 (1839) 1.04

In re Basis Yield Alpha Fund (Master) 381 BR 37 (Bkrtcy SDNY 2008) 6.135, 6.137, 6.138, 6.156, 6.161, 6.169

In re Bear Stearns 374 BR 122 (Bkrtcy SDNY 2007), aff’d 389 BR 325 (SDNY 2008) 6.133–6.135, 6.137–6.138, 6.147, 6.150, 6.156, 6.161, 6.164–6.165, 6.169

(p. xxv) Berger v Intelligent Solutions Inc 906 A 2d 134 (Del Ch, 2006) 2.32

In re Betcorp Ltd 400 BR 266, 285 (Bkrtcy DNev 2009) 6.137, 6.n224, 7.75, 7.n88

Biondi v Scrushy 820 A2d 1148 (Del Ch, 2003) 2.33

In re British American Insurance Company Ltd 425 BR 884 (Bkrtcy SDFla 2010) 6.135, 6.138, 6.148, 7.75

In re British American Isle of Venice (BVI) Ltd 441 BR 713 (Bkrtcy SDFla 2010). 6.136, 6.155

Caisse Nationale de Credit Agricole v CBI Industries 90 F 3d 1264 (US Ct of Apps (7th Cir), 1996) 2.n45

Caisse Nationale de Credit Agricole v Chameleon Finance Co BV (ND Ill, 17 February 1995) 2.36

Covey Gas & Oil Co v Checketts 187 F 2d 561 (US CA 9th Cir 1951) 7.12

Davenport Machine & Foundry Co v Adolph Coors Co 314 NW 2d 432 (Iowa SC, 1982) 2.30

De Santis v Hafner Creations Inc 949 F Supp 419, 424 n14 (ED Va 1996) 7.14

Draper v Gardner 625 A 2d 859 (Del SC, 1993) 1.n42

Edgar v MITE Corp 457 US 624, 102 S Ct 2629 (1982) 1.06

Erie Railroad v Tompkins 304 US 64, 58 S Ct 817 (1938) 7.12, 7.n14

Ernst & Young see In re Petition of Ernst & Young

In re Fairfield Sentry Ltd 440 BR 60, 64–65 (SDNY 2010) 6.135, 6.137, 6.n221, 7.75–7.76

Goad v Celotex Corp 831 F 2d 508, 512 n12 (US CA 4th Circ 1987) 7.13

Gries Sports v Modell 473 NE 2d 807 (Ohio SC, 1984) 1.07

Hanna v Plumer 380 US 460, 85 S Ct 1136 (1965) 7.n14

HTL Sp ZOO v Nissho Corporation 538 SE 2d 525 (Georgia Ct of Apps, 2001) 2.36

In re Innua Canada Ltd (Bkrtcy DNJ, 15 April 2009) 6.135, 6.147

ITEL Containers International v Atlanttrafik Express Service Ltd (SDNY, 13 July 1988) 1.06

Kamen v Kemper Financial Services Inc 500 US 90, 111 S Ct 1711 (1991) 1.n42

Ketcham v Charles R Lister International Inc 400 A 2d 487 (NJ Super Ct App Div, 1979) 2.30

Klaxon Co v Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co 313 US 487, 61 S Ct 1020 (1941) 7.12

Koster v (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co 330 US 518, 67 S Ct 828 (1947) 2.31

Labbe v Nissen Corp 404 A 2d 564, 570 (Maine Supr J Ct, 1979) 2.30

(p. xxvi) Lancaster v Amsterdam Improvement Co 35 NE 964 (NY CA, 1894) 1.04

Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co v Johnson 268 F 2d 317 (US Ct of Apps (5th Cir), 1959) 1.07, 1.08, 2.39

McDermott Inc v Harry Lewis 531 A 2d 206 (Del SC, 1987) 1.10

McWane Cast Iron Pipe Corp v McDowell-Wellmann Eng’g Co 263 A 2d 281 (Del SC, 1970) 2.n37

Montgomery v Forbes 19 NE 342 (Massachusetts Supr J Ct, 1889) 1.04

Order of United Commercial Travellers v Wolfe 331 US 586, 67 S Ct 1355 (1947) 1.10

Paul v Virginia 75 US 168 (1868) 1.04

Pennzoil Co v Texaco Inc 481 US 1 (1987) 7.23

In re Petition of Ernst & Young Inc 383 BR 773, 779 (D Colorado 2008) 6.135, 6.149, 6.169

In re Ran 607 F 3d 1017, 1023 (5th Circ 2010) 6.n193, 7.75

RW Sawant & Co v Ben Kozloff Inc 507 F Supp 614, 615-16 (ND Ill, 1981) 2.36

Rogers v Guaranty Trust Co of New York 288 US 123, 53 S Ct 295 (1933) 1.05

Rouhi v Harza Eng’g Co 785 F Supp 1290 (ND Ill, 1992) 2.36

Re Schefenacker plc (SDNY) available at http://www.chapter15.com/ 7.134–7.136

Soviet Pan Am Travel Effort v Travel Comm Inc 756 FSupp 126, 131 (SDNY, 1991) 1.26

In re SPhinX Ltd 351 BR 103, 118 (Bkrtcy SDNY 2006), aff’d 371 BR 10 (SDNY 2007) 6.122–6.134, 6.137, 6.139, 6.142–6.144, 6.148, 6.161, 6.169, 6.n199, 6.n219, 7.21, 7.72–7.73

State of Iowa ex rel Weedy v Bechtel 31 NW 2d 853 (Iowa SC, 1948) 2.40

Toklan Royalty Corp. v Tiffany 141 P 2d 571 (Oklahoma SC, 1943) 2.40

In re The Topps Co Shareholders Litigation 924 A 2d 951 (Del Ch, 2007) 2.33–2.34

In re Tradex Swiss AG 384 BR 34 (Bkrtcy D Mass 2008) 6.137, 6.169

In re Tri-Continental Exchange Ltd 349 BR 627, 635 (Bkrtcy EDCal 2006) 6.137, 6.147, 6.161, 6.170

Western Air Lines Inc v Sobieski 12 Cal Rptr 719 (California CA, 1961) 1.07, 1.08

Williams v Green Bay & Wisconsin Railroad Co 326 US 549, 66 S Ct 284 (1946) 1.05

Wilson v Louisiana-Pacific Resources, Inc 187 Cal Rptr 852, 854-855 (California CA, 1982) 2.41

Yates v Bridge Trading Co 844 SW 2d 56 (Missouri Ct of Apps, 1992) 1.07, 1.26