Argentina

• Diario La Ley, 22 October 1974, Case No 71031 2.101

Australia

• Burger King Corp v Hungry Jack’s Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 187 2.172

• New South Wales Court of Appeal in Renard Constructions (ME) Pty v Minister for Public Works [1992] 26 NSWLR 234 2.152

• Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589 1.147

• Rogers v The Queen [1994] HCA 42 1.140, 4.46

• Walton v Gardiner [1993] 177 CLR 378 1.139

Belgium

• Belgian Court of Cassation, 10 September 1971 (AC 1972, 42) 2.104

• Belgian Court of Cassation, 19 September 1983 (A.C., 1983–1984, 53–54) 2.104

• Belgian Court of Cassation, 18 June 1987 (AC 1986–87, 1441) 2.104

• Belgian Court of Cassation, 11 June 1992 (AC 1991–92, no 534) 2.104

• Belgian Court of Cassation, 1 February 1996 (AC 1996, no 66) 2.104

• Belgian Court of Cassation, 21 June 2000 (AC 2000, no 392) 2.104

• Belgian Court of Cassation, 8 February 2001 (AC 2001, no 78) 2.104

Canada

• Aselford Martin Shopping Centres Ltd v AL Raymond Ltée [1990] RJQ (CS), 1974–1976 2.137

• Banque Nationale du Canada v Houle [1990] 3 SCR 122 1.29, 2.94, 2.103, 2.105, 2.113, 2.136–2.137, 2.143, 3.31

• Caisse populaire de Baie St-Paul v Simard, Sup Ct Saguenay, No 24005000043845, 9 September 1985 2.94, 3.31

• Danyluk v Ainsworth Technologies Inc [2001] 2 SCR 460, 2001 SCC 44 1.147

• Des Cheneaux v Morin Inc. [1987] 20 QAC 157 2.94, 3.31

• Drouin v Électrolux Canada Ltée Division de les Produits CFC Ltée [1988] RJQ 950 1.29, 2.143

• Equipements Select Inc v Banque Nationale du Canada, Sup Ct Québec, N 20005003613820, November 18, 1986 2.103

• Macaulay v Imperial Life Assurance Co of Canada, Sup Ct Montréal, No 50005015231804, 19 April 1984 1.29

• Marcotte v Assomption Cie mutuelle d'assurancevie, [1981] CS 1102 1.29

• Modernfold (Bas St-Laurent) Ltée v New Castle Products (Canada) Ltd [1973] CS 220 2.79

• Posluns v Enterprises Lormil Inc [1990] Quebec 200-05-001584-858, JE 90-1131 (CS) 0.23, 2.93, 2.143, 4.171

• R v Scott [1990] 3 SCR 979 1.140, 4.46

• Sté Fiat Auto France v SA Cachia Holding et autres, Recueil Dalloz-Sirey 1995 J 355 2.143

• Toronto City v C.U.P.E. [2003] 3 SCR 77 1.140, 4.46

• Toronto (City) v Canadian Union of Public Employees [2003] SCJ No 64 (Sup Ct) 1.147

Egypt

• Cairo Court of Appeal, Session held on 5 February 2013, Case No. 35, 41, 44, and 45, Judicial Year 129 2.160(p. xii)

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 1 April 1982, Challenge No 1739, Judicial Year 51 1.89

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 10 March 2003, Challenge No 2803, Judicial Year 71 1.89–1.90, 1.94

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 12 July 1997, Challenge No 4338, Judicial Year 61 1.92, 1.96

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 13 February 2010, Challenge No 3317, Judicial Year 67 1.89, 2.29

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 13 July 1999, Challenge No 2886, Judicial Year 68 1.89, 1.92, 2.57

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 14 April 2008, Challenge No 18318, Judicial Year 76 1.90

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 14 December 2004, Challenge No 1302, Judicial Year 73 1.94, 1.96

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 15 January 1989, Challenge No 132, Judicial Year 56 1.89

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 17 May 1980, Challenge No 633, Judicial Year 46 1.89

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 2 January 1997, Challenge No 1481, Judicial Year 62 1.89, 1.97

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 22 April 2003, Challenge No 2633, Judicial Year 72 1.92, 2.57

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 22 June 2004, Challenges Nos 4729 and 4730, Judicial Year 72 4.207

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 23 November 1995, Challenge No 2845, Judicial Year 59 1.94

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 24 March 1991, Challenge No 1238, Judicial Year 56 1.89, 1.93, 2.94, 3.31

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 25 April 1981, Challenge No 2, Judicial Year 46 1.89

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 25 April 1985, Challenge No 2, Judicial Year 46 1.93

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 26 January 1980, Challenge No 108, Judicial Year 45 1.94

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 26 May 2004, Challenge No 5036, Judicial Year 72 1.89, 1.92, 2.29, 2.57

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 26 November 2002, Challenge No 86, Judicial Year 70 0.01

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 26 October 2008, Challenge No 15487, Judicial Year 77 1.89, 2.100

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 27 April 2006, Challenge No 3473, Judicial Year 75 0.39, 2.166

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 27 December 1993, Challenge No 2451, Judicial Year 57 1.95

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 27 February 2005, Challenge No 871, Judicial Year 74 1.89, 1.94, 2.65

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 27 February 2012, Challenge No 266, Judicial Year 71 1.89, 2.29

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 28 April 1983, Challenge No 1710, Judicial Year 52 1.89

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 28 June 1989, Challenge No 143, Judicial Year 52 1.89, 1.94

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 29 April 1993, Challenge No 306, Judicial Year 59 1.89

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 30 April 2001, Challenge No 1193, Judicial Year 69 1.94

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 30 December 1982, Challenge No 1834, Judicial Year 51 1.89(p. xiii)

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 4 April 1985, Challenge No 1244, Judicial Year 54 1.93, 1.95, 2.45, 2.94, 3.31

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 4 May 1999, Challenge No 4464, Judicial Year 68 1.89, 1.92, 2.29, 2.57

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 7 November 1993, Challenge No 1468, Judicial Year 57 1.89

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 8 May 2000, Challenge No 8388, Judicial Year 64 1.89, 1.94

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 9 February 2012, Challenge No 15906, Judicial Year 80 1.92, 1.94, 2.57

• Egyptian Court of Cassation, Session held on 9 June 1997, Challenge No 11865, Judicial Year 65 1.89

• Egyptian Supreme Constitutional Court, Session held on 13 January 2002, No 155, Judicial Year 20 4.165

• Egyptian Supreme Constitutional Court, Session held on 3 July 1999, No 104, Judicial Year 20 4.165

• Egyptian Supreme Constitutional Court, Session held on 6 November 1999, No 84, Judicial Year 19 4.165

England

• Abu Dhabi Gas Liquefaction Co. v Eastern Bechtel Corp [1982] 2 LIoyd’s Rep. 425 4.175

• Abu Dhabi National Tanker Company v Product Star Shipping Limited [1993] L1 Rep 397 2.158

• Alfred McAlpine Construction Limited v Unex Corporation Ltd [1994] 38 Con LR 63 4.175

• Allen v Flood [1898] App Cas. 1 1.110–1.111, 1.113

• Ashmore v British Coal Corp [1990] 2 QB 338 1.141, 1.142

• Attorney General v Barker [2000] 1 FLR 759 1.136, 1.149, 2.107

• Bank Mellat v Helliniki Techniki SA [1984] QB 291 3.65

• Besant v Wood, [1879] 12 Ch 605 2.187

• Boys v Chaplin [1971] AC 356 2.187

• Bremer Vulkan Schiffbau und Maschinenfabrik v South India Shipping Corp [1981] AC 909 4.83

• Bristol Groundschool Ltd v Intelligent Capture and others [2014] EWHC 2145 (Ch) 2.161

• Broxton v McClelland and Another [1995] EMLR 485 1.144

• CFC 26 Ltd v Brown Shipley and Co Ltd [2016] EWHC 3048 (Ch) 1.154

• Chapman v Honig [1963] 2 QB 502 1.103

• Christie v Davey, [1893] 1 Ch 316 1.114

• Crawford Adjusters (Cayman) Ltd. v Sagicor General Insurance (Cayman) Ltd. [2013] UKPC 17 1.154

• Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Company v The Ministry of Religious Affairs, Government of Pakistan, [2010] UKSC 46 3.71

• Dallal v Bank Mellat [1986] QB 441 4.145

• Eastleigh BC v Town Quay Developments Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1391 1.128

• Fender v St. John-Mildmay [1938] AC 1 2.187

• Fidelitas Shipping Co Ltd v V/O Exportchleb [1966] 1 QB 630 1.147, 1.148

• Goldsmith v Sperrings Ltd and Others [1977] 1 WLR 478 1.148, 1.156

• Henderson v Henderson [1843] 3 Hare 100, 67 ER 313 1.147, 1.148

• Hollywood Silver Fox Farm Ltd v Emmett [1936] 2 KB 468 1.114

• Hunter v Chief Constable of the West Midlands [1982] AC 529 1.142–1.143, 3.92, 4.45

• Interfoto Picture Library Ltd. v Stiletto Visual Programmes Ltd [1989] QB 433 (CA) 2.161

• Jameel v Dow Jones and Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75, [2005] QB 946 1.148, 2.107

• Johnson v Gore Wood & Co [2002] 2 AC 1 1.144, 1.147

• Juman v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago and Another [2017] UKPC 3 1.154

• Lovelock v Margo [1963] 2 All ER 13 (CA) 1.126

• Metropolitan Bank v Pooley [1885] 10 App Cas. 210 1.137

• Mid Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust v Compass Group UK and Ireland Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 200 2.161

• MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company SA v Cottonex Anstalt [2016] EWCA Civ 789 2.161(p. xiv)

• Naviera Amazonica Peruano SA v Compania Internacional de Seguros del Peru, [1988] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 116 3.65

• NC Ratiu et al v DP Conway [2005] EWCA Civ 1302 4.186

• Peterson Farms, Inc v C & M Farming Ltd [2003] EWHC 2298 (Comm) 3.72

• Premium Nafta Products Limited and Others v Fili Shipping Company Limited and Others [2007] UKHL 40 4.128

• Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd [2013] 2 AC 415 0.37, 2.61, 4.187

• Russ v Russ [1962] 3 WLR 930 2.190

• Russel v Russel [1897] AC 436 2.149

• Secretary of State for Employment v Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Fireman (No 2) [1972] 2 QB 455 1.114

• Socimer International Bank Ltd v Standard Bank London Ltd [2008] 1 L1 Rep 558 2.158

• The Mayor, Aldermen and Burgesses of the Borough of Bradford v Edward Pickles, [1895] AC 587 0.19, 1.103–1.104, 1.106–1.107

• Trendtex Trading Corporation v Central Bank of Nigeria [1977] QB 529 1.237

• Wallis v Valentine [2002] EWCA Civ 1034, [2003] EMLR 8 1.146

• Willers v Joyce [2016] UKSC 43 1.154

• Yam Seng Pte Limited v International Trade Corporation [2013] EWHC 111 (QB) 2.152, 2.158, 2.161, 2.197

France

• Affaire Clément-Bayard, Req 3 August 1915, DP III.1917.1.79 1.14, 1.33, 2.111

• Berjont v Andre de Giraud d’Agay and Rousset, Req. 8 June 1931, Sirey 1931.1.332 1.20

• Colmar, 2 May 1855, DP 1856.2.9, 10 1.09, 2.45, 3.11

• Court of Cassation, Alcatel Business Systems, Alcatel Micro Electronics and AGF v Amkor Technology et al, 11 JCP I 168, (2007) 4.203

• Epoux Vullion v Société immobilière Vernet- Christophe Subsequent Developments, JCP 1971. 2. 16781, translated by Tony Weir 1.24–1.25, 2.90, 2.124, 2.138

• French Cour de Cassation, Civ 1re, 24 June 2015, no 14-17795 1.19, 1.28, 2.46

• French Cour de Cassation, Civ 2re, 13 November 2015, no 13-28180 1.19, 1.28–1.29, 2.99, 2.114

• French Cour de Cassation, Civ 2re, 25 June 2015, no 14-19745 1.19, 1.28

• French Cour de Cassation, Civ 3re, 7 July 2015, no 14-17644 1.19–1.20, 1.28

• French Cour de Cassation, Civ 3re, 7 July 2015, no. 14-15211 1.19

• French Cour de Cassation, Civ 3re, 8 October 2015, no. 14-16216 1.19, 2.56

• French Cour de Cassation, Commercial Chamber, 3 November 2015, no 14-19191 1.20

• General National Maritime Transport Co v Société Gotaverken Arendal AB, Paris Court of Appeal, Decision of 21 February 1980, (1981) 20 ILM 884 3.65

• Kis France SA, Kis Photo Industrie SA v SA Société Générale, Sogelease Pacifique SA and others, Cour d’Appel, Paris, 31 October 1989, in Albert Jan van den Berg (ed) (1991) XVI Ybk Commercial Arbitration 145 4.204

• La Société Overseas Mining Investments Limited v La Société Commercial Caribbean Niquel, French Cour de Cassation, Civ 1re, 29 June 2011, Arrêt no 785 (10-23.321) 4.80

• Montpellier Cour d’Appel, 1re Chambre, Section C2, 21 October 2015, no 14-06363 1.19–1.20, 1.28, 2.46

• Recueil Dalloz- Sirey 1996 J 617 1.23

• Saint Galmier case, Lyon, 18 April 1856, DP 1856.2.199 2.56

• Siemens AG and BKMI Industrienlagen GmbH v Dutco Construction Co, 7 January 1992, Bull Civ 1, no 2 4.123, 4.177

• X . . . et autres v Sté Benetton Group SpA autres, Recueil Dalloz-Sirey 1995 J 569 1.23

Germany

• BGH, 30 January 1956, 20 BGHZ 4 (1956) 1.46

• BGH, 9 October 1956, 21 BGHZ 378, (1956) 1.46

• BGH, 29 November 1956, 22 BGHZ 226, 230 (1957) 1.45, 1.46, 2.175, 5.15

• BGH, 29 April 1959, BGHZ 30, 140 1.35, 2.180

• BGH, 20 May 1968, 50 BGHZ 191 (1969) 1.46

(p. xv) Japan

• Mitamura v Suzuki, 26 Saiko Saibansho minji hanreishu 1067 (Sup Ct, 27 June 1972) 2.86, 2.112

Kuwait

• Kuwaiti Court of Cassation, Session held on 12 December 1995, Challenges nos 59, 64, 65, and 72, Judicial Year 1995 2.160

Netherlands

• Kuipers v De Jongh, HR April 17, 1970, NJ 1971, no 89, translated in Chris Brunner, ‘Abuse of Rights in Dutch Law’ (1977) 37 Louisiana Law Review 729, 739 2.96, 2.124, 2.138

Paris

• La Societe Commercial Caribbean Niquel v La Societe Overseas Mining Investments Ltd, 25 March 2010, (1st Chamber), Appeal No 08/23901 4.80

• Labinal Case, Paris Court of Appeal, 1st Chambers A, 1993 Review Arbitrage 645 4.09

• Societe AKSA SA v Société Norsolor SA, Paris Court of Appeal, Decision of 9 December 1980, (1981) 20 ILM 887 3.65

Qatar

• Qatari Court of Cassation, Session held on 7 January 2014, Challenge No 176, Judicial Year 2013 0.34

South Africa

• Gien v Gien, 1979 (2) SA 1121 2.106

• Milward v Glaser (1949) 4 SA 931 2.109

United States of America

• 210 Baronne St Ltd. Partnership v First Nat'l Bank of Commerce, 543 So 2d 502, 507 (La App 4th Cir), writ denied, 546 So 2d 1219 (1989) 1.70, 2.69, 3.31

• Addison v Williams, 546 So 2d 220 (La 1989) 1.70, 2.69, 2.94, 3.11, 3.31

• American Bankers Insurance Group v Richard F. Long and Lillie M Long, 453 F 3d 623 (4th Cir 2006) 4.180

• Ballaron v Equitable Shipyards, Inc, 521 So 2d 481 (La 1988) 1.70, 2.47, 2.69, 2.94, 3.11, 3.31

• Basnett v Vista Village Mobile Home Park, 699 P 2d 1343 (Colo Ct App 1984) 1.126

• Blue Tee Corp v Koehring Company and United Dominion Industries, Inc, 999 F 2d 633, 634 (2nd Cir 1993) 4.41

• Breland v Louisiana Hospital Services, Inc, 488 So 2d 1215 (La App 1st Cir 1984), vacated on rehearing, 468 So 2d 1223 (La App 1st Cir 1985) 1.67

• Bridas SAPIC, et al v Turkmenistan, 447 F.3d 411 (5th Cir. 2006) 4.186

• Brittingham v Robertson, 280 A 2d 741 (Del 1971) 1.112

• Burke v Smith, 37 NW 838 (Mich 1888) 1.112

• Cataldie v Louisiana Health Services & Indemnity Co, 456 So 2d 1373 (La 1984) 1.81

• City of New Orleans v Levy, 233 La 844, 98 So 2d 210 (1957) 1.81

• Clark v Glidden Coating & Resins, 666 F Supp 868 (ED La 1987) 1.131

• Cohen v Ratinoff, 147 Cal App 3d 321, 195 Cal Rptr 84 (1983) 1.126

• Cox v Kirkpatrick, 404 So 2d 999 (La App 1st Cir 1981) 1.67, 1.81

• Daitch Crystal Dairies v Neisloss, 190 NYS 2d 737 (App Div 1959), aff’d mem, 167 NE 2d 643 (NY1960) 1.134

• Dipuma v Dipuma, 136 So 2d 505 (La App 1st Cir 1961) 1.81

• Fernandez v Vazquez, 397 So 2d 1171 (Fla Ct App 1981) 1.126

• Fidelity Bank and Trust Co v Hammons, 540 So 2d 461 (La 1989) 1.70, 1.75, 2.69, 2.94, 3.11, 3.31

• Folkways Music Publishers, Inc v Weiss, 989 F 2d 108, 111 (2nd Cir 1993) 4.34

• Fortune v National Cash Register Co, 364 NE 2d 1251 (Mass 1977) 1.131, 5.15

• Fox v City of Monroe, 15 La App 192, 131 So 483 (La App 2d Cir 1930) 1.81

• Fradella v Petricca, 183 F 3d 17, 19 (1st Cir 1999) 4.34(p. xvi)

• Generica Limited v Pharmaceuticals Basics Inc, United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, 96-4004, 29 September 1997, (1998) 23 Ybk Commercial Arbitration 1076 4.30

• Greenleaf v Francis, 35 Mass 117 (1836) 1.112

• Grigson v Creative Artists Agency LLC, 219 F 3d 524 (5th Cir 2000) 4.174

• Hero Lands Co v Texaco, Inc, 310 So 2d 93, 99 (La 1975) 1.67, 2.28

• Higgins Oil & Fuel Co v Guaranty Oil Co, 145 La 233, 82 So 206 (1919) 1.66, 1.72, 2.97, 2.129

• Horan v Byrnes, 72 NH 93, 100 (NH 1903) 1.123

• Hulley Enterprises, Yukos Universal and Veteran Petroleum v The Russian Federation, 20 October 2015, United States District Court, for the District of Columbia, Case No 1:14-cv-01996-ABJ 3.85, 4.189

• Illinois Central Gulf RR v International Harvester Co, 368 So 2d 1009 (La 1979) 1.67, 1.69, 1.75, 1.81, 1.129, 2.45, 2.76, 3.11

• Jenkins v Flower, 24 Pa 308 (1855) 1.112

• Karaha Bodas Co v Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Das Gas Bumi Negara, 364 F 3d 274 (5th Cir 2004) 0.38, 2.83

• Kawaguchi v Mizunoya, 24 Minshu 2015 (Sup Ct, 11 Dec 1970) 2.29

• Lambert v Maryland Casualty Co, 418 So 2d 553 (La 1982) 1.81

• Langlois v Allied Chemical Corporation, 249 So 2d 133, 258 La 1067 (1971) 1.72

• Larese v Creamland Dairies, Inc, 767 F 2d 716 (10 Cir 1985) 1.127

• Lawton v Smith, 146 So 461 (La App 2d Cir 1933) 1.67

• Louks v Standard Oil Co, 224 NY 99, 111, 120 NE 198 202 (1918) 2.187

• Lucke v Clothing Cutters & Trimmers, 77 Md 396, 26 A. 505 (1893) 1.111

• Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company v Steven F Nails, 549 So 2d 826 (La 1989) 1.75–1.76

• Maurin-Ogden-1978 Pinhook Plaza v The Wiener Corporation, 430 So 2d 747, (La App 5th Cir1983) 1.79, 1.81

• McCastle v Rollins Envtl Serv, 456 So 2d 612, 618 (La 1984) 2.103

• McCoy v Arkansas Natural Gas Co, 175 La 487, 143 So 383 (1932) 1.73

• Mcinnis v Mcinnis, 618 So 2d 672 (La App 2d Cir 1993) 1.75

• Morse v J Ray McDermott & Co, 344 So 2d 1353 (La 1977) 1.67–1.68

• Moss v Burke & Trotti, Inc, 198 La 76, 81, 3 So 2d 281 (1941) 2.129

• Obonai v Orizume Sangyo Co, 19 Minshu 2212 (Sup Ct, 21 Dec 1965) 2.29

• Onorato v Maestri, 173 La 375, 137 So 67 (1931) 1.67

• Ouachita National Bank in Monroe v Palowsky, 554 So 2d 108 (La 1989) 1.70, 2.69, 2.94, 3.11, 3.31

• Prestin v Mobil Oil Corp, 741 F 2d 268 (9th Circ 1984) 1.126

• Rath Packing Company v Joseph W. Jones, 530 F 2d 1295 (9th Cir 1975) 1.118

• Riggs v Palmer, 115 NY 506, 22 NE 188 (1889) 3.09

• Rosen v American Bank of Rolla, 627 A 2d 190 (Pa Super Ct 1993) 1.139, 1.141

• S.S. Kresge Co. v Ruby, 348 So 2d 484, 489 (Ala 1977) 1.154

• Sanborn v Oceanic Contractors, Inc, 448 So 2d 91 (La 1984) 1.67, 1.81, 1.131, 2.29

• Sarhank Group v Oracle Corporation, 404 F 3d 657 (2nd Cir 2005) 4.203

• Schweiso v Williams, 150 Cal App. 3d 883 (Cal Ct App 1984) 1.126

• Sheets v Teddy’s Frosted Foods Inc, 427 A 2d 385 (Conn 1980) 1.136

• Smith v Atlas Off-Shore Boat Services Inc, 653 F 2d 1057 (5th Circ 1981) 1.132

• State Bank of Commerce v Demco of Louisiana, 483 So. 2d 1119 (La App 5th Cir 1986) 2.27

• State Ex Rel Bailey v City of W Monroe, 418 So 2d 570 (La. 1982) 2.103

• Stolt-Nielsen SA v Animalfeeds Int’l, 130 S Ct 1758 (US S Ct 2010) 4.34

• Travelers Indemnity Co v Hunt, 371 So 2d 342 (La App 4th Cir), writ denied, 374 So 2d 657 (1979) 1.67, 2.61, 2.71, 2.103

• Trushinger v Pak, 513 So 2d 1151, 1154 (La 1987) 1.70, 2.47, 2.69, 2.94, 3.11, 3.31

• Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension v Andrew Lutyk, 332 F 3d 188 (3rd Cir 2003) 4.186

• Tymshare Inc v Covell, 727 F 2d 1145 (DC Cir 1984) 1.133

• Wachovia Bank, National Association v Schmidt, 445 F 3d 762 (4th Cir 2006) 4.180

• Younger v Solomon, 38 Cal App 3d 289 (1974) 1.141

(p. xvii) Switzerland

• Société des Grands Travaux de Marseille v People's Republic of Bangladesh, Bangladesh Industrial Development Corporation, Swiss Federal Tribunal, 5 May 1976,V Ybk Commercial Arbitration 217–19 (1980) 3.133

• Swiss Federal Tribunal (1st Civil law division), 14 May 2001, Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas SA v Colon Container Terminal SA, 19 ASA Bulletin 544 (2001) 4.119

• Swiss Federal Tribunal 4A_450/2013 of 7 April 2014 1.57, 4.198

• Swiss Federal Tribunal of 8 March 2006, Tensaccia SPA v Freyssinet Terra Armata R.L., 4P.278/2005, 24 ASA Bulletin 550 (2006) 3.118

• Swiss Federal Tribunal, 16 October 2003, 22 ASA Bulletin 364 (2004) 1.57

• Swiss Federal Tribunal, 24 November 2006, 4C.327/2005 1.57

• Swiss Federal Tribunal, 29 January 1996, 14 ASA Bulletin 496 (Kluwer Law International 1996) 1.57

• X SA v Y. Limited, 1st Civil Law Court, 4A_210/2008, 29 October 2008, 27 ASA Bulletin 309, 319 (2009) 4.119

Court of Justice of the European Union

• Case C-367/96 Alexandros Kefalas and Others v Elliniko Dimosio (Greek State) and Organismos Oikonomikis Anasygkrotisis Epicheiriseon AE (OAE)[1998] ECR I-02843, 12 May 1998 2.69

• Case C-373/97 Diamantis [2000] ECR I-1705, 23 March 2000 0.38, 2.83, 2.94, 3.31

• Case C-110/99 Emsland-Stärke GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas[2000] ECR I-1569, 14 December 2000 2.81

• Case C-321/05 Hans Markus Kofoed v Skatteministeriet [2007] ECR I-5795, 5 July 2007 2.81, 3.51

International Court of Justice

• Application for Review of Judgment No 158 of United Nations Administrative Tribunal, Advisory Opinion, [1973] ICJ Rep 166 4.10

• Barcelona Traction Case [1970] ICJ 324, Separate Opinion of Judge Ammoun 3.47

• Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Co, Ltd (Belgium v Spain) [1970] ICJ 39 0.37, 1.194, 2.61, 4.188

• Case Concerning the Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v Slovakia), Judgment of 25 September 1997, [1997] ICJ Rep 88 1.209

• Certain Norwegian Loans (France v Norway), Separate Opinion of Judge Sir Hersch Lauterpacht [1957] ICJ Rep 9 2.162

• Competence of the General Assembly for the Admission of a State to the United Nations, Advisory Opinion of 3 March 1950 1.207

• Fisheries Case (United Kingdom v Norway) Judgment of 18 December 1951, ICJ Rep 1951 1.204, 1.205

• Guinea-Bissau v Senegal, Case Concerning the Arbitral Award of 31 July 1989, [1991] ICJ Rep 53 3.75

• Immunities and Criminal Proceedings (Equatorial Guinea v France), Decision on the Preliminary Objections of 6 June 2018 [2016] ICJ Rep 1148 1.195

• International Status of South West Africa (Advisory Opinion) [1950] ICJ Rep 128 0.65, 1.01

• Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v Belgium), Separate Opinion of Judge Higgins [2004] ICJ Rep 279 3.92

• Nottebohm (Second Phase), (Liechtenstein v Guatemala), Judgment of 6 April, [1955] ICJ Rep 37 1.200, 1.203

• Nuclear Tests Cases [1974] ICJRep 253 2.152

• United Kingdom v Iceland [1973] ICJ Pleadings 267 1.237

Permanent Court of International Justice

• Case Concerning certain German Interests in Polish Upper Silesia (Germany v Poland) PCIJ Rep Series A/B No 46, Judgment of 25 May 1926 1.210–1.211, 2.184(p. xviii)

• Case of the Free Zones of Upper Savoy and the District of Gex (France v Switzerland) PCIJ Rep Series A/B No 46, Decision of 7 June 1932 1.212, 2.184

IRAN-US Claims Tribunal

• The Case of Frederica Lincoln Riahi v The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Case No 485, Award No 600-485-1 of 27 February 2003, Iran-US Claims Tribunals, Volume 37 (Cambridge University Press 2006) 1.221–1.223

• The Case of James M Saghi v the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Case No 298, Award No 544-298-2 of 22 January 1993, Iran-US Claims Tribunal, Volume 29 (Cambridge University Press 2000) 1.217–1.218

• The Case of Rouhollah Karubian v The Islamic Republic of Iran, Case No 419, Award No 569-419-2 of 6 March 1996, Iran-US Claims Tribunal, Volume 32 (Cambridge University Press 2001) 1.219, 1.220

Arbitration Chamber of Paris

• Arbitration Chamber of Paris, Case No 9246 of 1996, (1997) XXII Ybk Commercial Arbitration 28 3.18

• Korsnas Marma v Durand-Auzias, Review of Arbitration (1989) 4.203

Ad Hoc Arbitral Awards

• Antoine Fabiani (No 1), France v Venezuela, 31 July 1905, Reports of International Arbitral Awards, Volume X 4.73

• Benteler v Belgium, Award of 18 November 1983, (1986)1 Journal of International Arbitration 184 3.121

• Boffolo Case (of a general nature), Italian-Venezuelan Commission, (1903) Reports of International Arbitral Awards, Volume X 1.164

• Canfor Corporation v United States of America, Tembec et al v United Stated of America, (UNCITRAL), Order of the Consolidation Tribunal of 7 September 2005 4.35, 4.144, 4.146

• Chevron Corporation (USA) and Texaco Petroleum Company (USA) v The Republic of Ecuador, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No 34877, Interim Award of 1 December 2008 2.27, 2.192

• CME Czech Republic BV v The Czech Republic, UNCITRAL Arbitration Proceedings, Final Award of 14 March 2003 0.05, 4.136, 4.138

• CME Czech Republic BV v The Czech Republic, UNCITRAL Arbitration Proceedings, Partial Award of 13 September 2001 2.140, 4.140, 4.144, 4.157, 4.163, 4.217, 5.21

• FR German Engineering Company v Polish buyer, Interim Award, 9 September 1983, in Albert Jan van den Berg (ed) (1987) 12 Ybk Commercial Arbitration 63, 72 1.57, 4.190, 4.193

• HICEE BV v The Slovak Republic, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No 2009-11, Partial Award of 23 May 2011 4.95

• Himpurna California Energy Ltd v PT PLN (Persero), Ad-hoc arbitration under UNCITRAL rules, Final award of 4 May 1999, (2000) XXV Ybk Commercial Arbitration 11 2.92, 3.36, 3.106, 3.121–3.124, 3.128–3.130, 4.213, 5.15

• Lalanne and Ledour Case, (1903–1905) Reports of International Arbitral Awards, Volume X, 17–18 3.48

• Patuha Power Ltd (Bermuda) v PT (Persero) Perusahaan Listruik Negara (Indonesia) (1999) 14 Mealey’s Int’l Arb Rep. B-1, B-44 2.92, 3.36, 3.106, 3.122–3.123

• Philip Morris Asia Limited v The Commonwealth of Australia, PCA Case No 2012-12, Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility of 17 December 2015, under UNCITRAL Rules 0.49, 2.30, 3.75, 3.89, 4.95, 4.100, 4.103

• Ronald S Lauder v The Czech Republic, UNCITRAL Arbitration Proceedings, Award of 3 September 2001 2.140, 4.138, 4.140, 4.141, 4.145, 4.157, 4.163, 4.217, 5.21, 5.38

• SA v Alpha Beta & Co, Award of 1991, (1992) 10 ASA Bulletin 202 1.57, 4.192–4.193

• Saluka Investments BV v The Czech Republic, UNCITRAL Partial Award, registered by the Permanent Court of Arbitration of 17 March 2006 2.51(p. xix)

• ST-AD GmbH v Republic of Bulgaria, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No 2011-06, Award on Jurisdiction of 18 July 2013 0.05, 3.89, 4.91, 4.93, 4.99

• Trail Smelter Case (United States, Canada), Award of 11 March 1941, Reports of International Arbitral Awards, vol III, 1905–1982 1.167, 3.48

• UNCITRAL Arbitral Award, Case No SCH-4318, 15 June 1994 2.162

• Wintershell et al v The Government of Qatar, Ad hoc award of 1988, (1988) 15 Yearbook of Commercial Arbitration 30 2.149

• Yukos International Ltd (Isles of Man) v The Russian Federation, PCA Case No AA 227, Interim Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility of 30 November 2009 4.106

CRCICA

• CRCICA Case No 154 of 2000, Two African printing companies v An African printing authority, Final Award, in MEI Alam Eldin (ed), Arbitral Awards of the Cairo Regional Centre for International Commercial Arbitration II (Kluwer Law International 2003) 2.35

• CRCICA Case No 829/2012 (unpublished) 4.150

Geneva Chamber of Commerce and Industry

• A SpA. v B AG, Decision of 25 September 1997, 19 ASA Bulletin 745 (2001) 3.70

ICC

• ICC Case No 10671 of 2000, Interim Award (2006) Clunet 1417 4.182

• ICC Case No 10947 of 2002, (2004) 22 ASA Bulletin 308 3.121

• ICC Case No 11405 of 2001, (unpublished) 4.209

• ICC Case No 1160 of 2002, (2005) 16(2) ICC Bulletin 99 4.209

• ICC Case No 12456 of 2004, in Jean-Jacquez Arnaldez, Yves Derains, and Dominique Hascher (eds) Collection of ICC Arbitral Awards 2008-2011 (Kluwer Law International 2013) 826 2.94, 3.31, 4.182

• ICC Case No 13184 of 2011, Final Award, Distributor Z (US) v Company A (Mexico), Subsidiary B (US) (2011) XXXVI Ybk Commercial Arbitration 96 3.37

• ICC Case No 14208/14236 of 2013, Partial Award, (2013) 24 ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin 62 3.74, 3.92

• ICC Case No 1512 of 1971 (1976) I Ybk Commercial Arbitration 128 3.136–3.137

• ICC Case No 1803 of 1972 (1980) V Ybk Commercial Arbitration 177 3.132

• ICC Case No 18215/GZ/MHM (unpublished) 4.150

• ICC Case No 1939 of 1971, [1973] Review Arbitrage 145 3.121

• ICC Case No 3131 of 1979 (1984) IX Ybk Commercial Arbitration 109 2.162, 3.19

• ICC Case No 3276 of 1979, in Sigvard Jarvin and Yves Derains, Collection of ICC Arbitral Awards 1974-1985 (Kluwer Law 1990) 4.04

• ICC Case No 3380 of 1980 (1982) VII Ybk of Commercial Arbitration 116 3.19

• ICC Case No 3540 of 1980 (1982) VII Ybk Commercial Arbitration 124 3.19

• ICC Case No 3879 of 1984, Interim Award, Westland Helicopters Ltd v Arab Organization, et al (1986) XI Ybk Commercial Arbitration 127, 132 1.57, 4.24, 4.176, 4.191

• ICC Case No 4131 of 1982, Interim Award in Dow Chemical v Isover-Saint-Gobain, (1984) IX Ybk Commercial Arbitration 131 3.72, 4.204–4.205

• ICC Case No 4145 of 1983, Interim Awards and Final Award of 1983, 1984, and 1986 (1987) XXI Ybk Commercial Arbitration 97 3.18

• ICC Case No 5103 of 1988 4.207

• ICC Case No 5721 of 1990, in Yves Derains, Sigvard Jarvin, and JJ Arnaldez (eds.), ICC Arbitral Awards 1986-1990 (ICC Publications 1994) 2.162, 4.194

• ICC Case No 5730 of 1988 (1990)117 Journal du Droit 1029 4.207

• ICC Case No 5832 of 1988, in Yves Derains, Sigvard Jarvin, and JJ Arnaldez (eds), ICC Arbitral Awards 1986-1990 (ICC Publications 1994) 4.182

• ICC Case No 5894 of 1991 4.204

• ICC Case No 6000 of 1988 4.204, 4.207

• ICC Case No 6363 of 1991, (1992) XVII Ybk Commercial Arbitration 186 4.218(p. xx)

• ICC Case No 6474 of 1992, Partial Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility (2000) XXV Yearbook of Commercial Arbitration 278 3.18, 3.134

• ICC Case No 6500 of 1992 (1992) 119 Journal du Droit International 1015 3.18

• ICC Case No 7155 of 1993 4.204

• ICC Case No 7421 of 2010 (2010) 21 ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin 64 4.182

• ICC Case No 8163 of 1996, (2005) 16(2) ICC Bulletin 78 4.187

• ICC Case No 8163 of 2005 (2010) 16 ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin 77 4.195

• ICC Case No 8365 of 1996, in Jean-Jacques Arnaldez, Yves Derains, and Dominique Hascher, Collection of ICC Arbitral Awards 1996-2000 (Wolters Kluwer 2009) 3.20

• ICC Case No 8385 of 1995, (1997) 124 Clunet 1015, 1061–66 3.18, 3.20

• ICC Case No 8547 of 1999, in Albert Jan van den Berg (ed), Yearbook Commercial Arbitration 2003 Volume XXVIII (Kluwer Law International 2003) 27–38 3.43, 4.04

• ICC Case No 8910 of 1998 4.204

• ICC Case No 9797 of 2000, (2000) 15(8) Mealey’s Int’l Arb Rep A1 3.20

• ICC Case No. 6294 of 1991 (1991) 118 Clunet 1050 4.182

• Partial Award, ICC Case No 3267 of 1979 (1982) VII Ybk Commercial Arbitration 96 3.33

ICSID

• Abaclat and Others v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/07/5, Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility of 4 August 2011 1.136, 2.170

• ADC Affiliate Limited and ADC & ADMC Management Limited v The Republic of Hungary, ICSID Case No ARB/03/16, Award of the Tribunal, 2 October 2006 3.48

• Aguas del Tunari SA v Republic of Bolivia, ICSID Case No ARB/02/3, Decision on Respondent’s Objections to Jurisdiction of 21 October 2005 4.93, 4.95

• Ampal-American Israel Corp et al v Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No ARB/12/11, Decision on Jurisdiction of 1 February 2016 0.51, 2.128, 4.120, 4.147, 4.150–4.151, 4.155–4.156, 5.38–5.39

• Atlantic Triton Company Limited v People’s Revolutionary Republic of Guinea,ICSID Case No ARB/84/1, Award of 21 April 1986 2.51

• Autopista Concesionada de Venezuela, CA v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/5, Decision on Jurisdiction of 27 September 2001 4.95

• Caratube International Oil LLP and Mr Devincci Salah Hourani v Republic of Kazakhstan, ICSID Case No ARB/13/13, Award of 27 September 2017 3.107, 4.134

• Cementownia SA v Republic of Turkey, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/06/2, Award of 17 September 2009 2.08, 3.89, 3.98, 4.216

• ConocoPhillips Petrozuata BV, ConocoPhillips Hamaca BV, ConocoPhillips Gulf of Paria BV and ConocoPhillips Company v The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No ARB/07/30, Decision on Jurisdiction and the Merits of 3 September 2013 2.27, 3.97, 4.104

• Gold Reserve Inc v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/09/1, Award of 22 September 2014 3.89

• Gustav F W Hamester GmbH & Co KG v Republic of Ghana, ICSID Case No ARB/07/24, Award of 18 June 2010 2.185

• ICSID Case No ARB/81/1, 25 September 1983, X Ybk Commercial Arbitration 61, (Kluwer Law International 1985) 61 2.161

• Lao Holdings NV v The Lao People’s Democratic Republic, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/12/6, Decision on Jurisdiction of 21 February 2014 3.89

• Libananco Holding Ltd v Turkey, ICSID Case No ARB/06/8, Decision on Preliminary Issues of 23 June 2008 2.185, 3.92, 4.01, 4.108

• Malicorp Limited v The Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No ARB/08/18, Award of 7 February 2011 4.218

• Millicom International Operations BV and Sentel GSM SA v Republic of Senegal, ICSID Case No ARB/08/20, Decision on Jurisdiction of 16 July 2010 2.185, 3.121

• Mobil Corp v Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No ARB/07/27, Decision on Jurisdiction of 10 June 2010 2.131, 2.194, 3.95, 3.110, 4.91, 5.33(p. xxi)

• Orascom TMT Investments Sàrl v Republic of Algeria, ICSID Case No ARB/12/35, Award of 31 May 2017 0.51, 3.94

• Pacific Rim Cayman LLC v The Republic of El Salvador, ICSID Case No ARB/09/12, Decision on Jurisdiction of 1 June 2012 3.97, 4.93, 4.215, 5.33

• Phoenix Action Ltd v The Czech Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/06/5, Award of 15 April 2009 0.49, 2.30, 2.82, 2.162, 2.165, 3.48, 3.89, 4.93, 4.96–4.99, 4.216

• Quilborax SA, Non Metallic Minerals SA and Allan Fosk Kaplún v Plurinational State of Bolivia, ICSID Case No ARB/06/2, Decision on Provisional Measures of 26 February 2010 2.126, 4.110

• Renco Group v Republic of Peru, ICSID Case No UNCT/13/1, Partial Award on Jurisdiction of 15 July 2016 3.105

• Renée Rose Levy and Gremcitel SA v Republic of Peru, ICSID Case No ARB/11/17, Award of 9 January 2015 2.122, 2.131, 4.95, 5.34

• RomPetrol Group NV v Romania, ICSID Case No ARB/06/03, Decision on Preliminary Objections on Jurisdiction and Admissibility of 18 April 2008 2.185

• Rompetrol Group NV v Romania, ICSID Case No ARB/06/3, Award of 6 May 2013 3.90

• Saipem SpA v Bangladesh, ICSID Case No ARB/05/7, Award of 30 June 2009 2.38–2.39, 3.89, 3.100–3.102, 3.104

• Saipem SpA. v Bangladesh, ICSID Case No ARB/05/7, Decision on Jurisdiction of 21 March 2007 3.103

• SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No ARB/01/13, Procedural Order No 2, 16 October 2002 4.126

• Teinver SA, Transportes de Cercanias SA and Autobuses Urbanos del Sur SA v The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/09/1, Decision on Provisional Measures of 8 April 2016 2.123, 2.125, 4.106

• Tidewater Inc et al v the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No ARB/10/5, Decision on Jurisdiction of 8 February 2013 2.200, 4.145, 5.33

• Tokios Tokelės v Ukraine, ICSID Case No ARB/02/18, Dissenting Opinion of 29 April 2004 4.91

• Transglobal Green Energy LLC and Transglobal Green Panama SA v Republic of Panama, ICSID Case No ARB/12/28, Award of 2 June 2016 2.131, 3.89, 3.109

• Wasteful Management Inc v United Mexican States II, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/00/3, Mexico’s Preliminary Objection Concerning the Previous Proceedings, Decision of the Tribunal of 26 June 2002 3.88, 3.110, 4.89, 4.218

WTO

• WTO Appellate Body in the case of Brazil-Retreaded Tyres, (WT/DS332/AB/R) 17 December 2007 1.225, 3.49

• WTO Appellate Body in the case of United States—Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products (WT/DS58/AB/R) 12 October 1998 1.228, 2.171, 3.49, 3.128, 5.15

• WTO Appellate Body in the case of United States—Standard for Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline and Like Products of National Origin (WT/DS2/AB/R) (1996) 35 ILM 603, 626 1.230, 3.50

(p. xxii)