Australia

• ACCC v Valve Corporation (No 3) [2016] FCA 196 6.52

• Fleming v Marshall [2011] NSWCA 86 6.52

• Wragge v Sim Cooper and Company (Australia) Pty Ltd [1933] HCA 59; 50 CLR 483 6.89

Canada

• A.E. Le Page Real Estate Services Ltd. v Rattray Publications (1991) 5 OR (3d) 216 (Gen Div), affd. (1995), 21 OR (3d) 164 (CA) 1.46

• A-G Ont. v Russell (1921), 64 DLR 59, 49 OLR 103 (SC) 4.72

• Argo Co of Canada Ltd v Regal Scout (The) (1983), 148 DLR (3d) 412 7.53

• Bank of Nova Scotia v Sharp [1975] BCJ No 1148, 57 DLR (3d) 260 4.52

• Bloom Estate, re (2004) 27 BCLR (4th) 176 (SC) 7.82

• Bondholders Securities Corp v Manville et al [1933] SJ No 75, [1933] 4 DLR 699 3.39, 7.94, 7.97

• Browne v White [1947] 1 WWR 622 6.110

• Campbell v Imperial Bank (1924) 4 DLR 289, 55 OLR 318 (SC App Div) 4.72

• Canada Life Assurance Co. v Canadian Bank of Commerce (1974), 3 OR (2d) 70 4.114

• Canada Life Insurance Co. v Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (1979), 98 DLR 670, [1979] 2 SCR 669 (SCC) 4.04, 5.25–5.30, 5.42, 6.13, 6.32, 7.96

• Charron v Montreal Trust Co [1958] OR 597 7.13

• Di Giulio v Boland [1958] OR 384, 13 DLR (2d) 510 (Ont CA) 1.11

• Gallagher v Murphy [1929] SCR 288 1.32, 4.06

• Guy v Paré (1892) 1 Que SC 443 1.20

• Jensen v Tolofson (1995) 120 DLR (4th) 289 (SCC) 4.73

• Maubach v Bank of Nova Scotia (1987) 60 OR (2d) 189 (HCJ), affd (1987) 62 OR (2d) 220 1.46

• Shapiro et al v Greenstein (1969) 10 DLR (3d) 746 (Que CA) 1.46

Singapore

• Rals Internaiotnal Pte Ltd v Cagsa Bi Risparnio di Parma Piacenza Spa [2016] SGCA 53 5.76

South Africa

• Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd. v Sham Magazine Cenre [1977] (1) SA 484 (AD) 5.63

United Kingdom

• Abrey v Crux (1869) LR 5 CP 37, 21 LT 327 4.27

• Adams v Lindsell (1818) 1 B &Ald 681, 106 ER 250 4.46

• Alcock v Smith [1892] 1 Ch 238, 66 LT 126 4.110, 7.40(p. xiv)

• Allen v Kemble (1848) 6 Moo PC 314, 13 ER 704 4.14, 4.19, 4.37, 4.71, 6.114

• Amin Rasheed Shipping Corp v Kuwait Insurance Co [1984] AC 50 6.52

• Amner v Clark (1835) 2 C.M. & Rosc. 468; 150 ER 202 5.43, 5.44, 5.47, 6.21

• Anglo-Italian Bank v Wells (1878) 38 LT 197 (C.A.) 2.92

• Anon (1379) Bellewe 110, 72 ER 47 2.61

• Anon (1379) Bellewe 59, 72 ER 25 2.61

• Anon (1385) Bellewe 111, 72 ER 47 2.56

• Anon (1694) Holt KB 115, 90 ER 962 2.70, 2.77, 4.12

• Anon (1696) Holt KB 296, 90 ER 1063 2.70

• Anon (1697) 1 Comyns 43, 92 ER 950 2.89

• Anon (1699) 3 Salk 71, 91 ER 698 2.86

• Aquavita International SA, Glendive Enterprose Limited v Ashapura Minecham Limited [2014] EWHC 2806 (Comm) 6.101

• Arab Bank Ltd. v Ross [1952] 2 QB 216 5.21, 5.55

• Asiatic Banking Corporation, ex parte (1867) LR 2 Ch App 391 1.17

• Banco Atlantico SA v British Bank of the Middle East [1990] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 504 (CA) 4.63

• Banco Santander v Banque Paribas [2000] LCC 906 (CA) 8.28

• Bank of Baroda v Punjab National Bank [1944] AC 176, [1944] 2 All ER Rep 83 1.18

• Bank of England v Anderson (1837) 3 Bing (NC) 589, 132 ER 538 2.74

• Bank of England v Vagliano Bros [1891] AC 107, 1 LDAB 130, [1891-4] All ER Rep 93, 64 LT 353 1.18, 4.63

• Bank Polski v K J Mulder & Co [1942] 1 KB 497, [1942] 1 All ER 396 (CA); [1941] 2 KB 266, 4.63, 4.118, 6.89, 7.94

• Banque Des Marchands De Moscou (No 2), In re [1932] 1 WLR 1108 6.109

• Beaulieu v Finglam (1401) YB 2 Hen 4, f.18, pl 6 2.67, 2.68

• Bechuanaland Exploration Co. v London Trading Bank Ltd [1898] 2 QB 658 1.17

• Boehm v Sterling (1797) 2 Esp 575, 170 ER 460, 7 TR 423, 101 ER 1055 2.84, 2.89

• Brown v Davies (1789) 3 TR 80, 100 ER 466 2.89

• Burton v Davy (1437) 49 SS 117 2.61, 2.65, 2.66, 2.82

• Cammell v Sewell (1858) 3 H & N 617 6.73, 6.77, 7.37, 7.40, 7.41

• Carlos v Fancourt (1794) 5 TR 482, 101 ER 272 6.44

• Centrax Ltd v Citibank NA [1999] EWCA Civ 892; [1999] 1 All ER (Comm) 557 5.72, 5.75, 5.76

• Charge Card Services Ltd., re [1989] Ch 497, [1988] 3 All ER 702 (CA) 1.33, 2.12, 4.50

• Chat and Edgar Case (1663) 1 Keble 636, 83 ER 1156 1.16, 2.63, 2.64

• Claxton v Swift (1685) 3 Mod Rep 86, 87 ER 55 2.77

• Clerke v Martin (1702) 2 Ld Raym 757, 92 ER 6 2.80, 2.81

• Colonial Bank v Cady (1890) 15 App Cas 267, (1890) 63 LT (NS) 27 (HL) 1.17, 7.66, 7.75

• Commercial Marine & Piling Ltd v Pierse Contracting Ltd [2009] EWHC 2241 (TCC) 4.11

• Conley, re [1938] 2 All ER 127, 158 LT 323 4.12

• Cook v Lister (1863) 18 CBNS 543, 143 ER 215 4.14

• Cooksey v Boverie (1693) 2 Show KB 296, 89 ER 949 2.73

• Cooper v Cooper (1887) 13 App Cas 88, HL 7.13

• Cox v Troy (1882) 5 B & Ald. 474, 106 ER 1264 4.29

• Crouch v The Credit Foncier of England (1873) LR 8 QB 374, 29 LT 259 1.11

• Crowe v Clay (1854) 9 Exch 605, 156 ER 258 1.07

• Cutting v Williams (1702) 7 Mod 154, 87 ER 1160 2.80

• Duncan, Fox & Co. v North and South Wales Bank (1880) 6 App Cas 1, [1874-80] All ER Rep Ext 1406 (HL) 4.12

• Edelstein v Schuler & Co. [1902] 2 KB 144, [1900-3] All ER 884 1.17

• Embiricos v Anglo-Austrian Bank [1905] 1 KB 677 (CA) affirming[1904] 2 KB 870 (QBD) 4.114, 7.36(p. xv)

• Emeraldian v Wellmix Shipping Ltd [2010] EWHC 1411 (Comm) 4.11

• Esthalle v Esthalle (1613) YB 6 and 7 Ed 2 Eyre of Kent vol II 2.57

• Fitzroy v Cave [1905] 2 KB 364, [1904-7] All ER Rep 194 2.58

• Ferguson Shipbuilders Ltd v Voith Hydro GmbH & Co KG, 2000, SLT 229 6.100

• G & H Montage GmbH v Irvani [1990] 1 WLR 667 6.17, 6.18, 6.52, 6.53, 6.117

• G&H Montage GmbH v Irvani [1990] 1 WLR 692C, HL(E); [1990] 2 All ER 225, [1990] 1 WLR 667, [1990] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 14 (CA); [1988] 1 WLR 1285 (QBD) 4.65, 4.90, 4.123, 5.90, 6.16

• Goodwin v Robarts (1875) LR 10 Exch 337, 33 LT 272 affd. (1876) 1 1 App Cas 476, [1874-80] All ER Rep 628 (HL) 1.17

• Goy & Co Ltd., re [1900] 2 Ch 149 1.17

• Grant v Vaughan (1764) 3 Burr 1516, 97 ER 957 2.82, 2.84

• Haarbleicher v Baerselman (1914) 3 LDAB 113, 137 LT 564 (KB) 4.65

• Halpern v Halpern (Nos 1 and 2) [2007] EWCA Civ 291 [2008] QB 195 3.24

• Haly v Lane (1741) 2 Atk 181, 26 ER 513 2.89

• Harry v Perrit (1710) 1 Salk 133, 91 ER 126 2.81

• Hart v O’Connor [1985] AC 1000; [1985] 3 WLR 214 7.27

• Henthorn v Fraser [1892] 2 Ch 27, [1891–4] All ER Rep 908 4.42

• Hill v Lewis (1693) 1 Salk 132, 91 ER 124 2.80

• Hinton’s Case (1682) 2 Show KB 235, 89 ER 911 2.82

• Hodges v Steward (1692) 1 Salk 125, 91 ER 117 2.77

• Holamn v Johnson (1775) 1 Cowp 341; 98 ER 1120 5.45

• Hollandia (The) [1983] 1 AC 565, [1983] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 1 7.53

• Hopkinson v Forster (1874) LR 19 Eq 74 2.85

• Horne v Rouquette (1878) 3 QBD 514, CA 7.33

• Hussey v Jacob (1696) 1 Comyns 4, 92 ER 929 2.89

• James Lamont & Co. v Hyland (No 2) [1950] 1 KB 585, [1950] 1 All ER 929 (CA) 1.37, 4.71

• Karafarin Bank v Gholam Reza Mansoury Dara [2009] EWHC 3265 (Comm) [2010] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 236 5.11, 5.13–5.15, 6.19, 7.95

• Keene v Beard (1860) 8 CBNS 372, 141 ER 1210 (CCP) 2.85

• Koechlin et CIE v Kestenbaum Brothers [1927] 1 KB 889 7.41

• Kpohraror v Woolwich Building Society [1996] 2 LRC 526, [1996] 4 All ER 119 (CA) 1.46

• Kuwait Airways v Iraq Airways (Nos 4 and 5) [2002] UKHL 19, [2002] 2 AC 883 3.12

• Lebel v Tucker (1867) LR 3 QB 77, 17 LT 244 4.19, 7.94

• Lewis v Owen (1821) 4 B & Ald. 654, 106 ER 1076 4.29

• Lickbarrow v Mason (1794) 5 TR 683 (Hol) 7.44

• Lickbarrow v Mason (1787) 2 TR 63, 100 ER 35 2.89

• London Joint Stock Bank v Simmons [1892] AC 201, [1891-4] All ER Rep 415 2.88

• Mackender v Feldia AG [1967] 2 QB 590 (CA) 7.13

• Macmillan Inc v Bishopsgate Investment Trust plc (No 3) [1996] 1 WLR 387, [1996] 1 All ER 585(CA) 7.41, 7.69, 7.77

• Male v Roberts (1800) 3 Esp 163, 170 ER 574 4.79

• Marseilles Extension Railway and Land Company, In re (1885) 30 Ch D 598 6.30, 6.32, 6.33, 7.39

• Mason v Morgan (1834) 2 Ad & El 30, 111 ER 12 1.11

• Master v Miller (1791) 4 TR 320, 100 ER 1042; affd (1793) 2 HyBl 141, 126 ER 474 1.11

• Mead v Young (1790) 4 TR 28, 100 ER 876 2.88, 6.45

• Miliangos v George Frank (Textiles) Ltd [1976] AC 443, [1975] 3 All ER 801 (HL) 4.142

• Miller v Race (1758) 1 Burr 452, 97 ER 398 (KB) 2.82, 2.87

• Milnes v Dawson (1855) 5 Ex 948, 155 ER 413 1.11

• Morris v Lee (1786) 1 Comyns 43, 92 ER 950 2.89

• Morse v Slue (1671) 1 Ventris 190, 86 ER 129 2.67(p. xvi)

• Moulis v Owen [1907] 1 KB 746, 96 LT 596 (CA) 4.75, 4.146, 6.08, 6.15, 6.16, 7.29

• National Bank v Silke [1891] 1 QB 435 1.46

• Navig8 Pte Ltd v Al-Riyadh Co for Vegetable Oil Industry [2013] EWHC 328 (Comm) 7.60

• New York Life Insurance Co v Public Trustee [1924] 2 Ch 101 7.76

• Nova (Jersey) Knit Ltd. v Kammgarn Spinnerei GmbH [1977] 1 WLR 713, [1977] 2 All ER 463 (HL) 2.92, 4.63, 5.81, 6.34

• Novaknit Hellas SA v Kumar Bros [1998] 1 Lloyd’s Rep Bank (CA) 4.92

• Ophthalmic Innovations International v Ophthalmic Innovations International Incorporated [2004] EWHC 2948 Ch 6.100

• Oppenheimer v Cattermole [1976] AC 249; [1975] 2 WLR 347; [1975] 1 All ER 538; 50 TC 159, HL(E); 3.12

• Ose Gessellschaft v Jewish Colonial Trust (1927) 43 Times L Rep 398 4.51

• Pennington v Crossley & Son (1897) 1 LDAB 249, 77 LT 43 (CA) 4.46

• Pierson v Hutchinson (1899) 2 Camp 211, 170 ER 1132 1.07

• Potter v Brown (1804) 5 East R 123, 102 ER 1016 4.37

• Puget de Bras v Forbes (1792) 1 Esp 117, 170 ER 298 2.89

• Raiffeisen Zentralbank Osterreich AG v Five Star Trading LLC [2001] EWCA Civ 68, [2001] QB 825 6.103

• Randolph v Abbot of Hailes (1313–14) Eyre of Kent, 6 and 7 Edw II [1912] 27 Selden Society 32 2.61

• Rann v Hughes (1778) 7 TR 350n, 2 ER 18, 101 ER 1014 1.12, 4.27

• Robery & Co v Snaefell Mining Co. Ltd (1887) 20 QBD 152 6.110

• Robinson v Bland (1760) 2 Burr 1077, 97 ER 717 4.75, 4.146, 6.08, 6.14–6.16, 6.20, 7.29

• Roquette v Overmann (1875) LR 10 QB 525 4.12

• Rothschild v Currie, (1841) 1 QB 43, 113 ER 1045 4.19, 7.33, 7.94

• Rowe v Young (1820) 2 Bligh 391, 4 ER 372 4.12

• Salman v Barkyng (1422) YB 1 Hen VI 2.56

• Samcrete Egypt Engineers and Contractors v Land Rover Exports Limited [2001] EWCA Civ 2019, [2002] CLC 533 4.11, 6.100, 6.101

• Saunders v Anglia Building Society [1971] AC 1004 (HL) 6.45

• Serle v Norton (1841) 2 Mood & R 401, 174 ER 331 2.84

• Sichel v Borch (1864) 2 H & C 954, 159 ER 395 4.41

• Snaith v Mingay (1813) 1 M & S 87, 105 ER 33 4.28

• Sottomayor v De Barros (1877) 2 PD 81(PDA) 7.13

• Soward v Palmer (1818) 8 Taunt 277, 129 ER 390 6.110

• Starke v Cheeseman (1700) 1 Ld Raym 538, 91 ER 1259 2.70

• Stone v Rawlinson (1745) Willes 559, 125 ER 1320 1.11

• Stooke v Taylor (1880) 5 QBD 569 [575], 43 LT 200 4.72

• Tassell and Lee v Lewis (1695) 1 Lord Raymond 743, 91 ER 1397 2.80

• Tenax Steamship Co. v The Brimnes (Owners) [1973] 1 WLR 386; [1973] 1 All ER 769 (QBD) 4.49

• The Innkeeper’s Case (1369) YB Easter 42 Ed 3, f.11, pl 13 2.67

• Trueman v Hurst (1785) 1 TR 40, 99 ER 960 (ER) 2.89

• Turberville v Stamp (1697) 12 Mod 152, 88 ER 1228 2.67

• Vita Food Products Inc v Unus Shipping Co [1939] AC 277, [1939] 1 All ER 513 3.41, 7.62

• Warwicke v Noakes (1791) Peake, 98, 170 ER 93 (NS) 4.46

• Williams v Field (1694) 3 Salk 68, 91 ER 696 2.77

• Williams v Williams (1693) Carth 269, 90 ER 759 2.80

• Zebrarise Ltd v de Nieffe [2004] EWHC 1842 (Comm) 5.77, 6.19

(p. xvii) United States of America

• AD v Credit One Bank, NA 885 F 3d 1054 (2018) CA 7.25

• Amsinck v Rogers, 189 NY 252 (1907) 4.37

• APL Co Pte Ltd v UK Aerosolos Ltd 2007 US Dist Lexis 80247 7.56, 7.60, 7.64

• Artisans’ Bank v Park Bank, NY App Div LEXIS 30 (1864) 4.37

• Aymar v Sheldon, 12 Wend 443 (1834) 4.37

• Babcock v Jackson (1963) 12 NY 2d 473 3.10

• Bank of the United States v United States, 2 How 711 (1844) 4.37

• Baxter Nat. Bank v Talbot, 154 Mass 213 (1891) 4.37

• Bonedon v Page, 24 Mo 595 (1859) 4.37

• Brook v Van Nest, 58 NJL 162 (1895) 4.37

• Cameron v Gunstock Acres, Inc., 348 NE 2d 791 (1976) 7.29

• Chrysler Corp v Skyline Indus. Serv. 448 Mich 113, 528 NW 2d 698 (1995, Mich) 7.29

• Chrysler Corp. v Ford Motor Co. 972 F Supp 1097 (ED Mich 1997) 7.72

• Chuidain v Philippine Nat. Bank, 976 F 2d 561 CA 2001 7.29

• Clanton v Barne, 50 Ala, 403 (1874) 4.37

• Colonial Nat’l Bank v Duerr, 95 NYS 815 (1905) 4.37

• Cook v Litchfield, 9 NY 280 (1853) 4.37

• Cooper Industries, LLC v City of South Bend, 899 NE 2d 1274 (Ind, 2009) 7.72

• Cote, Ex parte, In re Deveze (1873) LR 9 Ch App 27 4.41

• Coulter v Stewart 93 Ariz 242 (1963) 6.112, 6.114

• Coulter v Stewart, 379 P 2d 910 (Ariz. 1963) 4.37

• Craig v Columbus Compress & Warehouse Company, No 44.910, 210 So 2d 645 (Miss 1968) 7.63

• Currier v Lockwood, 40 Conn 349 (1873) 4.37

• Douglas v Bank of Commerce, 97 Tenn 133 (1896) 4.37

• Dow v Rowell, 12 NH 49 (1841) 4.37

• Dundas v Bowler, US App LEXIS 383 (1844) 4.37

• Eider, The (1893) P 199 (CA) 4.49, 6.110

• Empire Bank v Dumond, 28 F Supp 3d 1179 (Okl, 2014) 6.99

• Everett v Vendryes (1859) 19 NY 436 4.19, 4.37

• Evergreen Marine Corp (Taiwan) v Global Terminal & Container Servs, (2000) US Dist Lexis 16208 7.60

• Faloona by Frederickson v Hustler Magazine, Inc 7999 F 2d 1000 CA (1986) 7.28

• Fourth Nat. Bank v Bragg, 102 SE 649 (Va 1920) 4.52

• Franconsteel Corporation v MPal Marinos 94 Civ. 1992 885 D Supp 86, 1995 US Dist LEXIS 5535 7.60

• Freese v Brownell, 35 NJL 286 (1871) 4.37

• Freestone Capital Partners LP. v MKA Real Estate Opportunity Fund I, LLC, 155 Wash App 643, 230 P 3d 625 6.99

• Glidden v Chamberlin, 167 Mass 486 (1897) 4.37

• Greathead v Walton, 40 Conn 226 (1873) 4.37

• Greenlee v Hardin, 157 Miss 229 (1930) 6.12, 6.88, 7.90, 7.94, 7.97

• Grimes v Tait, 21 OKl 361 (1908) 4.37

• Guernsey v Imperial Bank of Canada, 188 F 300 (8th Cir 1911) 4.37

• Hawkspere Shipping Co v Intamex, SA, 330 F 3d 225 (2003) 7.62

• Hazelhurst v Kean, 4 Yeates 19 (1804) 4.37

• Heidelback, ex parte 2 Low 526 (1876) 4.37

• Hennenlotter v De Orvananos 114 Misc 333, 186 NYS 488 (NY SC, 1921) 4.37, 6.11, 6.12, 6.32, 6.116, 7.94

• Hicks v Brown, 12 John R 142(NY SC 1815) 4.37(p. xviii)

• Holbrook v Vibbard, Ill LEXIS 87 (1840) 4.37

• Hunt v Standard, 15 Ind 33 (1859) 4.37

• Hunt v Standart, 15 Ind 33 (1860) 4.37

• Hyatt v Bank of Kentucky, 71 KY 193, 8 Bush 193 (1871) 4.19, 4.37, 4.93, 6.10, 6.12, 6.115, 7.94

• Hyde v Goodnow, 3 NY 266 (1850) 4.50

• Ideal Structures Corp v Levine Huntsville Development v Corp, 251 F Supp 3 CA (1973) 7.29

• Indem Ins Co v Hanjin Shipping Co 348 F 3d 628, 7th Cir 2003 7.60

• International Tracers of Merica v Hard, 89 Wash 2d 140, 570 P 2d 131 (1977, Wash) 7.29

• Johnson v Romamy Consumer Credit Corp. 515 A 2d 682 (Del, 1987) 6.99

• Kuenzi v Elvers (1859), 14 La Ann 391 (1859) 4.37

• Landis & GYR Inc v Zurich American Ins Co, 2019 US Dist 3 7.72

• Lee v Selleck, 33 NY 615 (1865) 4.37

• Lennig v Ralston, 23 Pa St 137 (1854) 4.37, 6.56

• Lincoln v Grant, 47 DC App 475 (1917–18) 4.72

• London and Brazilian Bank v Maguire (1895) QR 8 SC 358 4.63

• London and San Francisco Bank v Moore, 128 Cal 650 (1900) 4.37

• Louckas v Standard Oil 120 NE 198 (NY 1918) 3.12, 3.13

• Lowry’s Adm’rs v Western Bank, 7 Ala (NS) 120 (1844) 4.37

• Mackintosh v Gibbs, 79 NJL 40, 74 A 708 (1909), aff’d and modified, 81 NLJ 577, 80 A 554 (1911) 4.19, 4.37, 6.114

• Martin by Martin v John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company, 56 F Supp 2d 670 (1999, Va) 7.33

• Mayfield v Equitable Trust Co. 295 F 109 (1924) 6.114, 7.94

• McCornick & Co v Tolmie Bros., 46 Idaho 544 (1928) 6.89

• McKinney v National Dairy Council, 491 F Supp 1108 (D. Mass, 1980) 7.29

• National Bank of Michigan v Green, 33 Iowa 140 (1871) 4.37

• National Exchange Bank of Baltimore v Rook Granite Co., 155 NC 43 (1911) 4.27, 4.37

• Nichols v Porter, 2 W Va 13 (1867) 4.93

• Northern Ins. Co. of New York v Allied Mut. Ins., 9555 F 2d 1353 (CA, 1992) 7.33

• Ory v Winter, La LEXIS 40 (ED 1826) 4.71

• Page v Page, 24 Mo 596 (1857) 4.37

• Panama Processes v Cities Service Co., 796 P 2d 276 (1990, Okl) 7.29

• Parkwood, Inc, In re 149 App DC 67, 461 F 2d 158 CA (1971) 7.29

• Paulson v Shapiro, 490 F 2d 1 CA (1973) 7.28

• Phipps v Harding, 70 F 468 (7th Cir 1895) 4.37

• Pitman v Walker, (1922) 187 Cal. 667 (SC) 2.92

• Powers v Lynch, 3 Mass R 77 (1807) 4.37

• Prentiss v Savage, 13 Mass R 200 (1816) 4.37

• Price v Page, 24 Mo 65 (1856) 4.37

• Quaker City Nat’l Bank v. Showacre, 26 WV 48 (1885) 6.34

• Queensboro Nat. Bank of City of New York v Kelly, 48 F 2d 574 (1931) 4.37

• Ram Products Co., Inc v Chauncey, 967 F Supp 1071 Ind (1997) 7.28

• Raymond v Holmes, 11 Tex 54 (1854) 4.37

• Short v Trabue, 4 Metc (Ky) 299 (1863) 4.37

• Slacum v Pomery, 6 Cranch 221 (US SC, 1810) 4.37

• Society of Lloyd’s v Ashenden, 233 F 3d 473 (7th Cir 2000) 3.12, 7.93

• Spies v National City Bank, 61 LRA 193 (1903) 4.37

• Sterrett v Stoddard Lumber Co, 150 Ore 491 (1935) 6.110

• Story v McKay (1888) OJ No 181, 15 OR 169 4.37

• Teas v Kimball, 257 F 2d 817 (1958) 7.05, 7.28(p. xix)

• Trabue v Short, 18 La Ann 257 (1868) 4.37

• Trabue, Davis & Co. v R.H. Short & Co., 45 Tenn 293 (1868) 4.37

• Van Ommeren Bulk Shipping BV v Cooper 35 F Supp 2d 469 (1999) 7.60

• Venetian Slami Co v Parthenais, 554 So 2d 499 6.110

• Vimar Seguros Y Reasequrous v M/V Sky Reefer, 515 US 528 7.46, 7.61, 7.64

• Walling v Cushman (1920) 238 Mass 62 4.19, 6.12, 6.114, 7.90, 7.94, 7.97

• Weil v Sturgis, 23 Ky L Rptr 644 (1901) 4.37

• Williams v Wade, 1 Metcalf 82 (Mass, 1840) 4.37

• Wood Bros Homes, Inc v Walker Adj. Bureau, 198 Colo 444, 601 P 2d 1369 (1979, Colo) 7.29

• Yeatman v Cullen, 5 Blackf. 240, 1839 Ind. LEXIS 123 (1839) 4.37

(p. xx)