- Save
- Cite
-
Email this content
Share Link
Copy this link, or click below to email it to a friendEmail this contentor copy the link directly:The link was not copied. Your current browser may not support copying via this button.Link copied successfully
Sign in
- Preliminary Material
- Dedication
- Foreword
- General Editor’s Preface
- Preface
- Contents
- Table of Cases
- Permanent Court of International Justice
- International Court of Justice
- FIAT Awards
- AAP
- AAP (Dissenting Opinion)
- Abaclat (Dissent)
- Abaclat (Jurisdiction)
- ADC
- ADF (Award)
- ADF (Order No. 2)
- AES
- AES Summit (Award)
- Aguas del Tunari
- Aguas Provinciales
- Alpha Projektholding (Award)
- Amco (Annulment)
- Amco (Award)
- Amco (Jurisdiction)
- Amco (Resubmitted Jurisdiction)
- American Manufacturing (Award)
- American Manufacturing (Opinions)
- Anderson v Costa Rica
- Aucoven (Award)
- Aucoven (Jurisdiction)
- Austrian Airlines (Award)
- Azurix (Award)
- Azurix (Jurisdiction)
- Banro
- Bayindir
- Berschader (Award)
- Berschader (Separate Opinion)
- Bureau Veritas (Jurisdiction)
- Burlington (Jurisdiction)
- Cable Television (Award)
- Camuzzi (Jurisdiction)
- Canadian Cattlemen
- Canfor (Consolidation Order)
- Canfor (Order 4)
- Canfor (Order 5)
- Canfor (Preliminary Question)
- Casado (Award)
- Casado (Provisional Measures)
- CDC (Annulment)
- Cemex Asia
- CEMEX (Jurisdiction)
- Champion Trading (Award)
- Champion Trading (Jurisdiction)
- Chevron (Partial Award)
- CME (Final Award)
- CME (Partial Award)
- CME (Separate Opinion)
- CMS (Award)
- CMS (Jurisdiction)
- Commerce Group Corp.
- Continental Casualty (Award)
- Continental Casualty (Jurisdiction)
- Corn Products (Order)
- CSOB (Further Decision on Jurisdiction)
- CSOB (Jurisdiction)
- Duke v Ecuador
- Duke v Peru
- El Paso
- Enron (Ancillary Claim)
- Enron (Award)
- Enron (Jurisdiction)
- Ethyl (Jurisdiction)
- Eureko
- FEDAX (Award)
- FEDAX (Jurisdiction)
- Feldman (Award)
- Feldman (Jurisdiction)
- Fireman’s Fund
- Fraport
- Gas Natural
- Generation Ukraine (Award)
- Genin
- Glamis Gold
- Goetz (Award)
- Grand River (Award)
- Grand River (Jurisdiction)
- Gruslin
- Guinea/Atlantic Triton (Award)
- Hamester (Award)
- Holiday Inns
- Hrvatska
- Impregilo v Argentina
- Impregilo v Pakistan
- Inceysa (Award)
- Inmaris (Jurisdiction)
- Joy Mining
- Kaiser Bauxite
- Klöckner (Annulment)
- Klöckner (Award)
- Lanco
- Lauder
- Lemire
- LESI
- LETCO (Award)
- LG&E (Jurisdiction)
- LG&E (Liability)
- Loewen (Award)
- Loewen (Jurisdiction)
- Lucchetti (Annulment)
- Lucchetti (Award)
- Maffezini (Award)
- Maffezini (Jurisdiction)
- Malaysian Historical Salvors (Annulment)
- Merrill & Ring (Award)
- Metalclad (Award)
- Metalpar (Jurisdiction)
- Methanex (Amicus Decision)
- Methanex (Final Award)
- Methanex (Partial Award)
- Middle East Cement
- Mihaly
- MINE (Annulment)
- Mitchell (Enforcement Stay)
- Mobil Oil
- Mobil v Venezuela
- Mondev
- MTD (Award)
- MTD (Stay of Execution)
- Murphy Exploration (Award)
- National Grid (Award)
- National Grid (Jurisdiction)
- Noble Ventures (Award)
- Occidental Exploration (Award)
- Olguin (Award)
- Olguin (Jurisdiction)
- Pacific Rim
- Pan American (Preliminary Objections)
- Petrobart (Award)
- Phoenix
- Plama (Award)
- Plama (Jurisdiction)
- Pope & Talbot (Damages)
- Pope & Talbot (Interim Award)
- Pope & Talbot (Merits, Phase 2)
- Renta 4
- Renta 4 (Separate Opinion)
- Romak
- RosInvestCo (Final Award)
- RosInvestCo (Jurisdiction)
- Saba Fakes (Award)
- Saipem (Award)
- Saipem (Jurisdiction)
- Salini v Jordan (Award)
- Salini v Jordan (Jurisdiction)
- Salini v Morocco (Jurisdiction)
- Saluka (Award)
- Santa Elena (Award)
- SD Myers (Damages)
- SD Myers (Partial Award)
- Sempra Energy (Annulment)
- Sempra Energy (Award)
- Sempra Energy (Jurisdiction)
- SGS v Pakistan or Pakistan
- SGS v Philippines or Philippines
- Siemens (Jurisdiction)
- SOABI (Award)
- SPP (Dissent - 1988)
- SPP (Dissent - 1992)
- SPP (Jurisdiction No. 1)
- SPP (Jurisdiction No. 2)
- Swembalt
- Tanzania Electric (Award)
- Tecmed
- Telenor
- Thunderbird
- Tokios (Award)
- Tokios (Jurisdiction)
- Tokios (Opinion)
- Tradex (Award)
- Tradex (Jurisdiction)
- TSA Spectrum (Award)
- Tza Yap Shum
- Vacuum Salt
- Vivendi (Annulment)
- Vivendi (Award)
- Vivendi (Challenge)
- Vivendi (Jurisdiction)
- Waste Management (Award)
- Waste Management (Opinion)
- Waste Management II (Award)
- Wena Hotels (Annulment)
- Wena Hotels (Award)
- Wena Hotels (Interpretation Decision)
- Wena Hotels (Jurisdiction)
- Wintershall (Award)
- World Duty Free Company
- Yaung Chi Oo Trading (Award)
- Yukos (Interim Award)
- Zhinvali
- Other International Decisions or Awards
- Domestic Court Decisions
- Treaties
- Multilateral Treaties
- Bilateral Treaties
- Argentina-Belgo/Luxembourg BIT
- Argentina-Germany BIT
- Argentina-Netherlands BIT
- Argentina-Panama BIT
- Argentina-Spain BIT
- Argentina-US BIT
- Bulgaria-Cyprus BIT
- Chile-Peru BIT
- Italy-Jordan BIT
- Malaysia-Belgo/Luxembourg Agreement
- Netherlands-Bolivia BIT
- Netherlands-Czech/Slovak BIT
- Netherlands-Poland BIT
- Netherlands-Venezuela BIT
- Pakistan-Germany BIT
- Spain-USSR BIT
- Sri Lanka-UK BIT
- Switzerland-Pakistan BIT
- Switzerland-Philippines BIT
- Switzerland-Uzbekistan Agreement on Trade and Economic Cooperation
- Switzerland-Uzbekistan BIT
- Ukraine-Lithuania BIT
- UK-Egypt BIT
- US-Albania BIT
- US-Australia FTA
- US-Ecuador BIT
- US-Egypt BIT
- US-Iran Treaty of Amity
- US-Zaire BIT
- List of abbreviations
- Main Text
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Treaty Interpretation: History and Background
- 2.01
- A Pre-Vienna Convention Treaty Interpretation Rules
- B Development of the Convention Rules
- C Criticism of the Convention Rules
- D Customary Status and FIAT Use of the Convention Rules
- E Interpretation and Application Distinguished
- F Who May Interpret Treaties?
- G What May be Interpreted by the Convention Rules?
- 3 The General Rule of Treaty Interpretation
- 4 Supplementary Means of Interpretation
- 5 Non-Codified Means of Interpretation
- 6 Interpretation Jurisprudence Particular to Investment Arbitration
- 6.01
- A The AAP Rules
- B Failure to Apply Convention Rules
- C Unilateral Declarations Consenting to Investment Arbitration
- D Umbrella Clauses
- E Most Favoured Nation Clauses
- F Disclosure of Preparatory Work
- G Pro-Investor Bias in Interpreting Investment Treaties?
- H Restrictive Interpretation
- I Pre-Arbitration Waiting Periods
- J Interpreting Silence
- 7 Conclusion
- Further Material
- Appendix I Analytical Tables of FIAT Treaty Interpretation Practice
- Appendix II Comparison between Articles 27–29 of the 1966 ILC Draft and Articles 31–33 of the Vienna Convention
- Appendix III Comparative Table of Draft Treaty Interpretation Rules
- Appendix IV Umbrella Clause Comparative Table
- Appendix V Selected ICJ Decisions Confirming Customary Status of the Convention Rules
- Appendix VI Other Selected International Decisions Confirming Customary Status of the Convention Rules
- Appendix VII Selected Domestic Court Decisions Confirming Customary Status of the Convention Rules
- Select Bibliography
- Index
- [18.232.31.255]
- 18.232.31.255
