4.01 (n 2) Also G Hohloch, ‘Place of Injury, Habitual Residence, Closer Connection and Substantive Scope: The Basic Principles’ (2007) 9 YPIL 1. 4.04 (n 14) Add This element of the Commission’s reasoning is criticized by Professor de Boer, who describes the references in the explanatory memorandum and in Recital (17) to the modern approach to civil liability as ‘token remarks’ (T M de Boer (2007) 9 YPIL 19, 28–9) and argues that, had this proposition been carried to its logical conclusion, Art 4(1) would have designated the place of the victim’s domicile rather...
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full
content. Please,
subscribe
or
login
to access all content.