Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation

Part IV Common Law Legal Systems, 14 United States of America

Lissa Lamkin Broome

From: Liability of Financial Supervisors and Resolution Authorities

Edited By: Danny Busch, Christos Gortsos, Gerard McMeel QC

From: Oxford Legal Research Library (http://olrl.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2023. All Rights Reserved.date: 27 February 2024

Subject(s):
Civil liability of lenders — Regulatory liability of lenders — Bank resolution and insolvency — Bank supervision — Capital markets — Supervision — Central bank immunity

In the United States there is limited liability for financial supervisors and resolution authorities. Although the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) permits suit against the United States for certain torts to provide compensation for those injured by government wrongdoing, the statute has a significant exception for discretionary functions. This exception has been interpreted to cover most conduct of federal financial regulators. When a bank becomes insolvent, however, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is appointed as its receiver and assumes all of the bank’s rights, including the ability to sue its former officers and directors for liability. In such suits, the officers and directors often assert affirmative defences based on the FDIC’s own conduct. The affirmative defences, if successful, only reduce the amount of the FDIC’s claims against the defendants and do not serve as a positive theory for recovery against the FDIC. Liability has been found, however, when the government promised the benefit of particular accounting practices to depository institutions that purchased failed thrifts but later enacted legislation that precluded the application of those accounting practices.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.