- Save
- Cite
-
Email this content
Share Link
Copy this link, or click below to email it to a friendEmail this contentor copy the link directly:The link was not copied. Your current browser may not support copying via this button.Link copied successfully
Sign in
- Preliminary Material
- Main Text
- Introduction
- Part I Mapping the Terrain
- 1 From an Invisible College to an Ethical No-Man’s Land
- 1.01
- 1.02
- 1.03
- 1.04
- 1.05
- 1.06
- 1.07
- 1.08
- 1.09
- 1.10
- 1.11
- A The early modern international arbitration system
- B Modern international arbitration
- C Globalization of the legal profession
- D Regulation of transnational law practice
- E Regulation of attorneys in international arbitration
- F Conclusion
- 2 Arbitrators, Barbers, and Taxidermists
- 2.01
- 2.02
- 2.03
- 2.04
- 2.05
- 2.06
- 2.07
- 2.08
- 2.09
- 2.10
- A Arbitrator selection and the marketplace for arbitrator services
- B Sources of international arbitrators’ ethical duties
- C International arbitrators’ substantive ethical obligations
- 2.101
- 1 The obligation of impartiality and independence
- 2 Other ethical obligations
- D Conclusion
- 3 Attorneys, Barbarians, and Guerrillas
- 3.01
- 3.02
- 3.03
- 3.04
- 3.05
- 3.06
- 3.07
- 3.08
- 3.09
- A Counsel ethics in international arbitration proceedings
- B National differences in ethical rules
- C Internationalization and enforcement
- D Conclusion
- 4 Experts, Partisans, and Hired Guns
- 4.01
- 4.02
- 4.03
- 4.04
- 4.05
- 4.06
- 4.07
- A Comparative differences in expert witnessing
- B Expert witnesses in international arbitration
- C Procedural reforms and the panda’s thumb
- D Conclusion
- 5 Gamblers, Loan Sharks, and Third-Party Funders
- 5.01
- 5.02
- 5.03
- 5.04
- 5.05
- 5.06
- 5.07
- 5.08
- 5.09
- 5.10
- 5.11
- 5.12
- 5.13
- 5.14
- 5.15
- 5.16
- 5.17
- A Definitions and mechanics
- B Funders and other participants in international arbitration
- C Regulation of third-party funding in international arbitration
- D Conclusion
- 1 From an Invisible College to an Ethical No-Man’s Land
- Part II Staking Out Theoretical Boundaries and Building the Regime
- 6 Chanticleer, the Fox, and Self-Regulation
- 6.01
- 6.02
- 6.03
- 6.04
- 6.05
- 6.06
- 6.07
- 6.08
- 6.09
- A Defining self-regulation
- B Self-regulation in international arbitration
- 6.44
- 1 International arbitration as a self-regulatory regime
- 2 Arbitrator regulation as a model of professional self-regulation
- 3 Self-regulation of counsel in international arbitration
- C Conclusion
- 7 Ariadne’s Thread and the Functional Thesis
- 7.01
- 7.02
- 7.03
- 7.04
- 7.05
- 7.06
- A A theory of professional ethics
- B The Functional Thesis as a prescriptive tool
- C Conclusion
- 8 Herodotian Myths and the Impartiality of Arbitrators
- 8.01
- 8.02
- 8.03
- 8.04
- A The myth of the ‘non-humanness of judges’
- B The new role and new ethics of investment arbitrators
- C Impartiality obligations of party-appointed arbitrators
- D Reforming and refining the selection process
- E Conclusion
- 9 Duck-Rabbits, a Panel of Monkeys, and the Status of International Arbitrators
- 10 Castles in the Air and the Future of Ethics in International Arbitration
- 6 Chanticleer, the Fox, and Self-Regulation
- Further Material
- [34.204.172.188]
- 34.204.172.188
