Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
Corruption in International Investment Arbitration by Llamzon, Aloysius P (1st September 2014)

Part II The Jurisprudence on Corruption in International Investment Arbitration: Case and Trend Analysis, 6 The Cases

From: Corruption in International Investment Arbitration

Aloysius P Llamzon

Subject(s):
Corruption — UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules — Standard of proof — BITs (Bilateral Investment Treaties)

This chapter discusses the decisions and awards in nineteen cases identified as significant for the study of corruption in international investment arbitration. It covers the following: cases where corruption was outcome-determinative; [e.g. World Duty Free Company Ltd. v. Republic of Kenya, Metal-Tech v. Khazakhstan, and Siemens v. Argentina] and cases where corruption allegations did not prosper [e.g. Southern Pacific Properties v. Arab Republic of Egypt, Wena Hotels Ltd. v. Arab Republic of Egypt, and Tanzania Electric Supply Co. v. Independent Power Tanzania Ltd].

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.